Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21469837›Full record

ArticlePhysical review letters2011

Double-stranded RNA resists condensation.

Li Li, Suzette A Pabit, Steve P Meisburger, Lois Pollack

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physical review letters, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Universality in RNA and DNA deformations induced by salt, temperature change, stretching force, and protein binding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. DNA under Force: Mechanics, Electrostatics, and Hydration.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Li LiSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Suzette A Pabit
Steve P Meisburger
Lois Pollack
Cornell University · US

Funding

TRAINING IN MOLECULAR PHYSICS OF BIOLOGICAL SYSTEMST32GM008267 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY ITHACA · PI WANG, MICHELLE D. · 1988 to 2021
$9.6M
RNA folding: from global structure to atomic detailR01GM085062 · NIGMS · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI ELBER, RON, POLLACK, LOIS · 2009 to 2017
$2.7M
Analytical Electrostatics: Methods and Biological Applications.R01GM076121 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI ONUFRIEV, ALEXEY VLAD · 2006 to 2014
$2.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM076121NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM085062NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008267
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much attention has been focused on DNA condensation because of its fundamental biological importance. The recent discovery of new roles for RNA duplexes demands efficient packaging of double-stranded RNA for therapeutics. Here we report measurements of short DNA and RNA duplexes in the presence of trivalent ions. Under conditions where UV spectroscopy indicates condensation of DNA duplexes into (insoluble) precipitates, RNA duplexes remain soluble. Small angle x-ray scattering results suggest that the differing surface topologies of RNA and DNA may be crucial in generating the attractive forces that result in precipitation.

Indexed as

AbsorptionDNARNA, Double-StrandedScattering, Small AngleUltraviolet RaysX-Ray DiffractionDNARNA, Double-Stranded

Identifiers

PMID21469837
PMCPMC3156472
OpenAlexW2029485175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.