Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21467952›Full record

ArticleJournal of glaucoma

Driving simulation as a performance-based test of visual impairment in glaucoma.

Felipe A Medeiros, Robert N Weinreb, Erwin R Boer, Peter N Rosen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of glaucoma. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Glaucoma and Driving Risk under Simulated Fog Conditions.Translational vision science & technology · 2016
    Article
  8. [Basic psychosomatic care in ophthalmology. Relevance, training and case examples].Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft · 2016
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A combined index of structure and function for staging glaucomatous damage.Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960) · 2012
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felipe A MedeirosHamilton Glaucoma Center, Department of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0946, USA. fmedeiros@glaucoma.ucsd.edu
Robert N Weinreb
Erwin R Boer
Peter N Rosen
University of California, San Diego · US

Funding

VISUAL FUNCTION IN GLAUCOMA AND OCULAR HYPERTENSIONR01EY008208 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MEDEIROS, FELIPE · 1990 to 2010
$5.7M
Diagnostic Innovations in Glaucoma Study (DIGS): Functional ImpairmentR01EY021818 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MEDEIROS, FELIPE · 2011 to 2015
$3.4M
NEI NIH HHS EY08208NEI NIH HHS R01 EY008208NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021818
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The fundamental goal of glaucoma management is to prevent patients from developing visual impairments sufficient to produce disability in their daily lives and impair their quality of life. Ultimately, patients are interested in how their vision will impact their ability to perform daily activities, such as driving. Although technologic advancements such as automated perimetry and devices for optic nerve imaging have resulted in great improvement in our ability to quantify structural and functional damage in glaucoma, the impact on vision-related quality of life of some of the information acquired from these tests remain elusive. In contrast, performance-based measures may be better correlated to traditional measures of vision health and, more importantly, they provide a more direct measure of disability. Driving simulators can be used as a performance-based test for evaluation of functional impairment in glaucoma. Their use can potentially help in the evaluation of driving safety and performance of diseased subjects and provide insight into the different mechanisms involved in causing driving impairment in this disease. The ability to do this in an experimentally controlled and standardized setting enables testing of a much larger number of hypotheses compared with on-road evaluations. Besides evaluating driver fitness, simulators could also potentially be used as a sophisticated test to evaluate cognitive impairment in the context of an everyday task (driving) that has not been available through traditional neuropsychologic assessment.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingComputer SimulationDisability EvaluationActivities of Daily LivingGlaucomaHealth StatusHumansPersons with Visual DisabilitiesQuality of LifeVision Disorders

Identifiers

PMID21467952
PMCPMC3804259
OpenAlexW2092633251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.