Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21467267›Full record

ArticleGenome research2011

Comprehensive long-span paired-end-tag mapping reveals characteristic patterns of structural variations in epithelial cancer genomes.

Axel M Hillmer, Fei Yao, Koichiro Inaki, Wah Heng Lee, Pramila N Ariyaratne, Audrey S M Teo, Xing Yi Woo, Zhenshui Zhang, Hao Zhao, Leena Ukil and 29 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Global analysis of somatic structural genomic alterations and their impact on gene expression in diverse human cancers.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  15. The tandem duplicator phenotype as a distinct genomic configuration in cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors.

Axel M HillmerGenome Technology and Biology, Genome Institute of Singapore, Singapore 138672, Singapore.
Fei Yao
Koichiro Inaki
Wah Heng Lee
Pramila N Ariyaratne
Audrey S M Teo
Xing Yi Woo
Zhenshui Zhang
Hao Zhao
Leena Ukil
Jieqi P Chen
Feng Zhu
Jimmy B Y So
Manuel Salto-Tellez
Wan Ting Poh
Kelson F B Zawack
Niranjan Nagarajan
Song Gao
Guoliang Li
Vikrant Kumar
Hui Ping J Lim
Yee Yen Sia
Chee Seng Chan
See Ting Leong
Say Chuan Neo
Poh Sum D Choi
Hervé Thoreau
Patrick B O Tan
Atif Shahab
Xiaoan Ruan
Jonas Bergh
Per Hall
Valère Cacheux-Rataboul
Chia-Lin Wei
Khay Guan Yeoh
Wing-Kin Sung
Guillaume Bourque
Edison T Liu
Yijun Ruan

Funding

NCI NIH HHS 5 R33 CA126996-02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatic genome rearrangements are thought to play important roles in cancer development. We optimized a long-span paired-end-tag (PET) sequencing approach using 10-Kb genomic DNA inserts to study human genome structural variations (SVs). The use of a 10-Kb insert size allows the identification of breakpoints within repetitive or homology-containing regions of a few kilobases in size and results in a higher physical coverage compared with small insert libraries with the same sequencing effort. We have applied this approach to comprehensively characterize the SVs of 15 cancer and two noncancer genomes and used a filtering approach to strongly enrich for somatic SVs in the cancer genomes. Our analyses revealed that most inversions, deletions, and insertions are germ-line SVs, whereas tandem duplications, unpaired inversions, interchromosomal translocations, and complex rearrangements are over-represented among somatic rearrangements in cancer genomes. We demonstrate that the quantitative and connective nature of DNA-PET data is precise in delineating the genealogy of complex rearrangement events, we observe signatures that are compatible with breakage-fusion-bridge cycles, and we discover that large duplications are among the initial rearrangements that trigger genome instability for extensive amplification in epithelial cancers.

Indexed as

Base PairingBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorChromosome MappingComputational BiologyDNAFemaleGene RearrangementGenome, HumanGenomic Structural VariationHumansSequence Analysis, DNAStomach NeoplasmsDNA

Identifiers

PMID21467267
PMCPMC3083083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.