Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21464901›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

Dissecting regulatory networks of filopodia formation in a Drosophila growth cone model.

Catarina Gonçalves-Pimentel, Rita Gombos, József Mihály, Natalia Sánchez-Soriano, Andreas Prokop

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Abl signaling directs growth of a pioneer axon inMolecular biology of the cell · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Transcriptional Reorganization ofFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The Formin DAAM Functions as Molecular Effector of the Planar Cell Polarity Pathway during Axonal Development in Drosophila.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2015
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catarina Gonçalves-PimentelFaculty of Life Sciences, Wellcome Trust Centre for Cell-Matrix Research, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Rita Gombos
József Mihály
Natalia Sánchez-Soriano
Andreas Prokop

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 077748/Z/05/ZWellcome Trust 087742/Z/08/ZWellcome Trust 092403/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

F-actin networks are important structural determinants of cell shape and morphogenesis. They are regulated through a number of actin-binding proteins. The function of many of these proteins is well understood, but very little is known about how they cooperate and integrate their activities in cellular contexts. Here, we have focussed on the cellular roles of actin regulators in controlling filopodial dynamics. Filopodia are needle-shaped, actin-driven cell protrusions with characteristic features that are well conserved amongst vertebrates and invertebrates. However, existing models of filopodia formation are still incomplete and controversial, pieced together from a wide range of different organisms and cell types. Therefore, we used embryonic Drosophila primary neurons as one consistent cellular model to study filopodia regulation. Our data for loss-of-function of capping proteins, enabled, different Arp2/3 complex components, the formin DAAM and profilin reveal characteristic changes in filopodia number and length, providing a promising starting point to study their functional relationships in the cellular context. Furthermore, the results are consistent with effects reported for the respective vertebrate homologues, demonstrating the conserved nature of our Drosophila model system. Using combinatorial genetics, we demonstrate that different classes of nucleators cooperate in filopodia formation. In the absence of Arp2/3 or DAAM filopodia numbers are reduced, in their combined absence filopodia are eliminated, and in genetic assays they display strong functional interactions with regard to filopodia formation. The two nucleators also genetically interact with enabled, but not with profilin. In contrast, enabled shows strong genetic interaction with profilin, although loss of profilin alone does not affect filopodia numbers. Our genetic data support a model in which Arp2/3 and DAAM cooperate in a common mechanism of filopodia formation that essentially depends on enabled, and is regulated through profilin activity at different steps.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalActin-Related Protein 2-3 ComplexActinsAnimalsCell ShapeDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsGene Regulatory NetworksGrowth ConesNeuronsPhenotypeProfilinsPseudopodiaActin-Related Protein 2-3 ComplexActinsDrosophila ProteinsProfilins

Identifiers

PMID21464901
PMCPMC3065487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.