Reporting of article retractions in bibliographic databases and online journals.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report.Research integrity and peer review · 2022
   Article
2. Media and social media attention to retracted articles according to Altmetric.PloS one · 2021
   Article
3. Correcting duplicate publications: follow up study of MEDLINE tagged duplications.Biochemia medica · 2019
   Article
4. Opinion: Medical misinformation in the era of Google: Computational approaches to a pervasive problem.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
   Article
5. The visibility of scientific misconduct: A review of the literature on retracted journal articles.Current sociology. La Sociologie contemporaine · 2017
   Review
6. Perpetuation of Retracted Publications Using the Example of the Scott S. Reuben Case: Incidences, Reasons and Possible Improvements.Science and engineering ethics · 2016
   Article
7. Retractions in orthopaedic research: A systematic review.Bone & joint research · 2016
   Article
8. Propagation of errors in citation networks: a study involving the entire citation network of a widely cited paper published in, and later retracted from, the journal Nature.Research integrity and peer review · 2016
   Article
9. Bringing retracted papers into focus.Clinical and experimental otorhinolaryngology · 2015
   Article
10. Knowledge and awareness regarding biomedical waste management in dental teaching institutions in India- A systematic review.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2014
    Review
11. Knowledge and awareness of the Consumer Protection Act among dental professionals in India: A systematic review.Indian journal of dentistry · 2014
    Review
12. Self-correction in biomedical publications and the scientific impact.Croatian medical journal · 2014
    Article
13. The persistence of error: a study of retracted articles on the Internet and in personal libraries.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2012
    Article
14. A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature.PloS one · 2012
    Article
15. Knowledge and awareness of forensic odontology among dentists in India: A systematic review.Journal of forensic dental sciences
    Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as