Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21464727›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists2011

Expression of the stem cell marker, Nanog, in human endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Xi Zhou, Yu-Ping Zhou, Guang-Rong Huang, Bao-Lan Gong, Bo Yang, Dong-Xia Zhang, Pin Hu, Sheng-Rong Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xi ZhouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Renmin Hospital, Hubei Medical University, Shiyan, Hubei, China. xzho98@yahoo.com.cn
Yu-Ping Zhou
Guang-Rong Huang
Bao-Lan Gong
Bo Yang
Dong-Xia Zhang
Pin Hu
Sheng-Rong Xu
Hubei University of Medicine · CN

Funding

ODCDC CDC HHS 223-01-2464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The embryonic stem cell self-renewal gene, Nanog, has been shown to be expressed in several tumor types and to regulate tumor development. The aim of this study was to carry out a detailed analysis of Nanog expression in human endometrial adenocarcinoma (EAC). Immunohistochemical analysis and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction were used to characterize Nanog, Sox2, and Oct4 expression in tissue arrays containing EAC, benign endometrium samples, and tumorosphere cells. Tumorosphere formation of EAC-derived cells in the stem cell culture medium was also analyzed. Nanog expression was then analyzed in secondary tumors initiated by the injection of tumorospheres or tumorosphere-derived differentiated cells into 15 female nude mice. Apoptosis and cell proliferation were detected in the fluorescence-activated cell sorter and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide experiments, respectively. The Nanog protein was expressed in a majority of EAC samples (45 of 55, 81.8%), but not in benign endometrium samples (0 of 26, 0.0%). Oct4 and Sox2 were also commonly expressed in EAC samples (42 of 55, 76.4% and 39 of 55, 70.9%, respectively). Subsets of cancer cells from all EAC samples (15 of 15, 100%) exhibited the capacity to form Nanog-positive tumorospheres. The tumorospheres also expressed Nanog, Oct4, and Sox2 mRNA and showed a higher proliferation potential than differentiated cells. All 15 mice that were injected with tumorosphere cell-formed tumors, whereas only 3 of 15 mice injected with differentiated cells derived from tumorospheres developed tumors. All secondary xenograft tumors still expressed Nanog protein and Nanog, Oct4, and Sox2 mRNA, and had higher proliferation and lower apostosis than did differentiated cells. Overexpression of Nanog in EACs suggests that Nanog may represent a potential therapeutic target for EAC. In addition, Nanog may be useful as a biomarker in an immunohistochemical panel to differentiate between EAC and benign endometrial tissues. The expression of Nanog in tumorospheres may be indicative of the presence of a population of endometrial cancer stem cells, and its expression in xenograft tumors suggests that Nanog may also be associated with tumor metastasis.

Indexed as

AdenocarcinomaAnimalsApoptosisBiomarkers, TumorCell SeparationEndometrial NeoplasmsFemaleFlow CytometryHomeodomain ProteinsHumansImmunohistochemistryMiceMice, NudeNanog Homeobox ProteinNeoplastic Stem CellsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionBiomarkers, TumorHomeodomain ProteinsNanog Homeobox ProteinNANOG protein, human

Identifiers

PMID21464727
PMCPMC3077452
OpenAlexW2009576011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.