Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21464038›Full record

ArticleCancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)2011

Phospho-sulindac (OXT-328) combined with difluoromethylornithine prevents colon cancer in mice.

Gerardo G Mackenzie, Nengtai Ouyang, Gang Xie, Kvetoslava Vrankova, Liqun Huang, Yu Sun, Despina Komninou, Levy Kopelovich, Basil Rigas

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Targeting the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in cancer.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2020
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gerardo G MackenzieDivision of Cancer Prevention, Department of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA.
Nengtai Ouyang
Gang Xie
Kvetoslava Vrankova
Liqun Huang
Yu Sun
Despina Komninou
Levy Kopelovich
Basil Rigas
Medicon (United States) · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Colon Cancer Prevention with Phospho-SulindacR01CA139454 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI RIGAS, BASIL · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Phospho-valproic acid for pancreatic cancer preventionR01CA154172 · NCI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI RIGAS, BASIL · 2010 to 2014
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS 1N01CN43302WA22NCI NIH HHS N01 CN043302NCI NIH HHS R01-CA139453NCI NIH HHS R01 CA139454NCI NIH HHS R01CA13945402NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) sulindac and the ornithine decarboxylase (ODC) antagonist difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), individually and together, are effective inhibitors of colon carcinogenesis. However, chronic use of sulindac is associated with significant side effects. We evaluated the chemopreventive efficacy of phospho-sulindac (P-S, OXT-328), an apparently safe derivative of sulindac, together with DFMO, in HT-29 human colon cancer xenografts. Nude mice were divided into four groups as follows: group 1 received vehicle (corn oil); group 2 received P-S (100 mg/kg/d) by oral gavage; group 3 received DFMO (2% in drinking water); and group 4 received P-S (100 mg/kg/d) by gavage plus DFMO (2% in drinking water; P-S/DFMO). Eighteen days after implantation, compared with controls, tumor volume was inhibited 65.9% by P-S, 52.9% by DFMO, and 70.9% by P-S/DFMO (P < 0.01 for all). P-S/DFMO reduced cell proliferation 27.1% and increased apoptosis 38.9% compared with controls (P < 0.05 for both). Compared with controls, P-S reduced the levels of thioredoxin-1 (Trx-1) and thioredoxin reductase (TrxR), whereas DFMO reduced polyamine content (putrescine and spermidine) and TrxR levels. Importantly, P-S/DFMO decreased putrescine and spermidine levels and the expression of Trx-1, TrxR, and cyclooxygenase (COX) 2. Of these molecular targets, TrxR most consistently correlated with tumor growth. Study results show that P-S/DFMO is an efficacious drug combination for colon cancer prevention and also show the safety of P-S, which may overcome the limiting side effects of conventional sulindac. P-S/DFMO has an intricate mechanism of action extending beyond polyamines and including the thioredoxin system, an emerging regulator of chemoprevention. P-S/DFMO merits further evaluation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsApoptosisCell ProliferationChromatography, High Pressure LiquidColonic NeoplasmsEflornithineFemaleHumansImmunoenzyme TechniquesMiceMice, NudeOrganophosphorus CompoundsPolyaminesSulindacAntineoplastic AgentsEflornithineOrganophosphorus CompoundsOXT-328PolyaminesSulindac

Identifiers

PMID21464038
PMCPMC3131469
OpenAlexW2099383868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.