Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21463970›Full record

Trial reportThe spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society2011

Immediate reduction in temporal sensory summation after thoracic spinal manipulation.

Mark D Bishop, Jason M Beneciuk, Steven Z George

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03541538 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Hypoalgesic Effects of Specific vs Non-specific Cervical Manipulation in Healthy Subjects

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidade Federal de Sao CarlosRan2018 to 2018Enrolled21ConditionsPainArmsGlobal manipulation, Especific manipulation
NCT04744883 early_phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Evaluating Specific and Non-Specific Mechanisms in Two Distinct Complementary/Integrative Interventions for Chronic Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorRush University Medical CenterRan2020 to 2026Enrolled140ConditionsChronic Low-back PainArmsSpinal Manipulation Therapy (SMT), Naloxone, Placebo, Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction Therapy (MT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Changes in pain sensitivity following spinal manipulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology · 2012
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mark D BishopDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. bish@ufl.edu
Jason M Beneciuk
Steven Z George

Funding

Neurobiological Mechanisms of Body Based Intervention for Musculoskeletal PainK01AR054331 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BISHOP, MARK D. · 2008 to 2012
$554k
NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR054331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background contextSpinal manipulative techniques (SMT) have shown clinical effectiveness in some patients with musculoskeletal pain. PURPOSE: We performed the current experiment to test whether regional pain modulation is to be expected from thoracic SMT. STUDY DESIGN/

settingRandomized experimental design performed in a university pain laboratory. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was experimental pain sensitivity in cervical and lumbar innervated area.

methodsNinety healthy volunteers were randomly assigned to receive one of three interventions (SMT, exercise, or rest) to the upper thoracic spine. Participants completed questionnaires about pain-related affect and expectations regarding each of the interventions. We collected experimental pain sensitivity measures of cervical and lumbar innervated areas before and immediately after randomly assigned intervention. Mixed model analysis of covariance was used to test changes in measures of experimental pain sensitivity.

resultsNo interactions or intervention (group) effects were noted for pressure or A-delta-mediated thermal pain responses. Participants receiving SMT had greater reductions in temporal sensory summation (TSS).

conclusionsThis present study indicates thoracic SMT that reduces TSS in healthy subjects. These findings extend our previous work in healthy and clinical subjects by indicating change in the nocioceptive afferent system occurred caudal to the region of SMT application. However, the duration of reduction in TSS is unknown, and more work needs to be completed in clinical populations to confirm the relevance of these findings.

Indexed as

Thoracic VertebraeAdolescentAdultExerciseFemaleHot TemperatureHumansMaleManipulation, SpinalPainPain MeasurementPain ThresholdPerceptionTime FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID21463970
PMCPMC3092807

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.