ArticleBiophysical journal2011
Models with energy penalty on interresidue rotation address insufficiencies of conventional elastic network models.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mutually beneficial confluence of structure-based modeling of protein dynamics and machine learning methods.Current opinion in structural biology · 2023Review
- DynOmics: dynamics of structural proteome and beyond.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- iGNM 2.0: the Gaussian network model database for biomolecular structural dynamics.Nucleic acids research · 2016Article
- Functional Importance of Mobile Ribosomal Proteins.BioMed research international · 2015Review
- PIM: phase integrated method for normal mode analysis of biomolecules in a crystalline environment.Journal of molecular biology · 2013Article
- Elastic Network Models are Robust to Variations in Formalism.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In this study, I present a new elastic network model, to our knowledge, that addresses insufficiencies of two conventional models-the Gaussian network model (GNM) and the anisotropic network model (ANM). It has been shown previously that the GNM is not rotation-invariant due to its energy, which penalizes rigid-body rotation (external rotation). As a result, GNM models are found contaminated with rigid-body rotation, especially in the most collective ones. A new model (EPIRM) is proposed to remove such external component in modes. The extracted internal motions result from a potential that penalizes interresidue stretching and rotation in a protein. The new model is shown to pertinently describe crystallographic temperature factors (B-factors) and protein open↔closed transitions. Also, the capability of separating internal and external motions in GNM slow modes permits reexamining important mechanochemical properties in enzyme active sites. The results suggest that catalytic residues stay closer to rigid-body rotation axes than their immediate backbone neighbors. I show that the cumulative density of states for EPIRM and ANM follow different power laws as functions of low-mode frequencies. When using a cutoff distance of 7.5 Å, The cumulative density of states of EPIRM scales faster than that of all-atom normal mode analysis and slower than that of simple lattices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.