Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21463517›Full record

ReviewImplementation science : IS2011

Bridging the gap between basic science and clinical practice: the role of organizations in addressing clinician barriers.

Megan Beckett, Elaine Quiter, Gery Ryan, Claude Berrebi, Stephanie Taylor, Michelle Cho, Harold Pincus, Katherine Kahn

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Implementation science : IS, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Translating Alcohol Research: Opportunities and Challenges.Alcohol research : current reviews · 2015
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Challenges and facilitators of community clinical oncology program participation: a qualitative study.Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Megan BeckettRAND Health, Santa Monica, California, USA.
Elaine Quiter
Gery Ryan
Claude Berrebi
Stephanie Taylor
Michelle Cho
Harold Pincus
Katherine Kahn

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNew National Institutes of Health policies call for expansion of practice-based research to improve the clinical research enterprise and facilitate dissemination of evidence-based medicine.

objectiveThis paper describes organizational strategies that influence clinicians' decisions to participate in clinical research.

designWe reviewed the literature and interviewed over 200 clinicians and stakeholders.

resultsThe most common barriers to community clinician participation in clinical research relate to beliefs that clinical research is too burdensome and has little benefit for the participating clinician or patient. We identified a number of approaches healthcare organizations can use to encourage clinicians to participate in research, including an outreach campaign to promote the benefits of clinical research; selection of study topics of interest to clinicians; establishment and enforcement of a set of research principles valuing the clinician and patient; development of a transparent schedule of reimbursement for research tasks; provision of technological and technical assistance to practices as needed; and promotion of a sense of community among clinicians involved in practice-based research.

conclusionsMany types of existing healthcare organizations could provide the technical and intellectual assistance community clinicians need to participate in clinical research. Multiple approaches are possible.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchDecision MakingEvidence-Based MedicineHumansInterviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID21463517
PMCPMC3086857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.