Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2011
Coronary-artery bypass surgery in patients with left ventricular dysfunction.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 445 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH)
FAPl Imaging Assessment of Revascularization Outcome in Ischemic Heart Failure
Who cites it
445 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,282 citations in OpenAlex.
- Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of percutaneous coronary intervention on chronic total occlusions with documented viability or ischemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of Various Surgical Approaches for Moderate-to-Severe Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- An updated systematic review on heart failure treatments for patients with renal impairment: the tide is not turning.Heart failure reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Cancer Mortality in Trials of Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2020Pooled it
- Impact of baseline risk of death or hospitalization on effectiveness of revascularization in patients with ischaemic left ventricular dysfunction-a prespecified analysis of REVIVED-BCIS2.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2025Trial
- Characteristics and Outcomes of Older Patients Undergoing Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Impella.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Trial
- Frailty, age, and treatment effect of surgical coronary revascularization in ischemic cardiomyopathy: a post hoc analysis of the STICHES trial.GeroScience · 2025Trial
- Use of sacubitril/valsartan early after CABG.Open heart · 2024Trial
- Arrhythmia and Death Following Percutaneous Revascularization in Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Prespecified Analyses From the REVIVED-BCIS2 Trial.Circulation · 2023Trial
- Outcomes With Intermediate Left Main Disease: Analysis From the ISCHEMIA Trial.Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions · 2022Trial
- Cost-Effectiveness of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Medicine in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: The STICH Randomized Clinical Trial.Circulation · 2022Trial
- Renal function and coronary bypass surgery in patients with ischemic heart failure.The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2022Trial
- The independent reduction in mortality associated with guideline-directed medical therapy in patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes · 2021Trial
- Association of early versus delayed normalisation of left ventricular ejection fraction with mortality in ischemic cardiomyopathy.Open heart · 2021Trial
- Trial
- Article
- Invasive and medical management approaches to non-acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2026Review
- Bidirectional impact between cardiovascular comorbidities and heart failure: an updated position paper from the Italian society of cardiology (SIC) working group on heart failure.Heart failure reviews · 2026Article
- Coronary revascularisation in British Columbia: 25-year trends in volume and modality.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2026Article
385 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by[Not Available].2011
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
23 authors at 16 institutions in 11 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe role of coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease and heart failure has not been clearly established.
methodsBetween July 2002 and May 2007, a total of 1212 patients with an ejection fraction of 35% or less and coronary artery disease amenable to CABG were randomly assigned to medical therapy alone (602 patients) or medical therapy plus CABG (610 patients). The primary outcome was the rate of death from any cause. Major secondary outcomes included the rates of death from cardiovascular causes and of death from any cause or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes.
resultsThe primary outcome occurred in 244 patients (41%) in the medical-therapy group and 218 (36%) in the CABG group (hazard ratio with CABG, 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72 to 1.04; P=0.12). A total of 201 patients (33%) in the medical-therapy group and 168 (28%) in the CABG group died from an adjudicated cardiovascular cause (hazard ratio with CABG, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.66 to 1.00; P=0.05). Death from any cause or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes occurred in 411 patients (68%) in the medical-therapy group and 351 (58%) in the CABG group (hazard ratio with CABG, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64 to 0.85; P<0.001). By the end of the follow-up period (median, 56 months), 100 patients in the medical-therapy group (17%) underwent CABG, and 555 patients in the CABG group (91%) underwent CABG.
conclusionsIn this randomized trial, there was no significant difference between medical therapy alone and medical therapy plus CABG with respect to the primary end point of death from any cause. Patients assigned to CABG, as compared with those assigned to medical therapy alone, had lower rates of death from cardiovascular causes and of death from any cause or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and Abbott Laboratories; STICH ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00023595.).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.