ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2011
Impact of 15N R2/R1 relaxation restraints on molecular size, shape, and bond vector orientation for NMR protein structure determination with sparse distance restraints.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collision-induced transfer enhances ligand-binding kinetics in guanine quadruplex DNA.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Fast NMR method to probe solvent accessibility and disordered regions in proteins.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Xplor-NIH for molecular structure determination from NMR and other data sources.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2018Article
- Structural insights of tBid, the caspase-8-activated Bid, and its BH3 domain.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2013Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(15)N R(2)/R(1) relaxation data contain information on molecular shape and size as well as on bond vector orientations relative to the diffusion tensor. Since the diffusion tensor can be directly calculated from the molecular coordinates, direct inclusion of (15)N R(2)/R(1) restraints in NMR structure calculations without any a priori assumptions is possible. Here we show that (15)N R(2)/R(1) restraints are particularly valuable when only sparse distance restraints are available. Using three examples of proteins of varying size, namely, GB3 (56 residues), ubiquitin (76 residues), and the N-terminal domain of enzyme I (EIN, 249 residues), we show that incorporation of (15)N R(2)/R(1) restraints results in large and significant increases in coordinate accuracy that can make the difference between being able or unable to determine an approximate global fold. For GB3 and ubiquitin, good coordinate accuracy was obtained using only backbone hydrogen-bond restraints supplemented by (15)N R(2)/R(1) relaxation restraints. For EIN, the global fold could be determined using sparse nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE) distance restraints involving only NH and methyl groups in conjunction with (15)N R(2)/R(1) restraints. These results are of practical significance in the study of larger and more complex systems, where the increasing spectral complexity and number of chemical shift degeneracies reduce the number of unambiguous NOE assignments that can be readily obtained, resulting in progressively reduced NOE coverage as the size of the protein increases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.