Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21462723›Full record

ArticleEthnicity & disease2011

Recruitment of Mexican American adults for an intensive diabetes intervention trial.

Molly A Martin, Susan M Swider, Tamara Olinger, Elizabeth Avery, Carmen M Tumialán Lynas, Kimberly Carlson, Steven K Rothschild

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ethnicity & disease, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01067092 (MATCH), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01067092 nacompletednot on this map

MATCH: The Mexican-American Trial of Community Health Workers

TypeinterventionalSponsorRush University Medical CenterRan2005 to 2010Enrolled144ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsCommunity Health Worker Intervention, Educational Newsletter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Recruiting rural participants for a telehealth intervention on diabetes self-management.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Molly A MartinRush University Medical Center, Department of Preventive Medicine, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. molly_a_martin@rush.edu
Susan M Swider
Tamara Olinger
Elizabeth Avery
Carmen M Tumialán Lynas
Kimberly Carlson
Steven K Rothschild
Rush University Medical Center · US

Funding

Mexican-American Trial of Community Health Workers-MATCHR01DK061289 · NIDDK · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROTHSCHILD, STEVEN K. · 2004 to 2008
$1.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK061289
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEffective behavioral diabetes interventions for Mexican Americans are needed. Our study focused on efforts to recruit Mexican American adults for a trial testing a diabetes community health worker (CHW) self-management intervention.

designBehavioral randomized controlled trial, community-based participatory research approach.

settingChicago.

participantsMexican American adults with type 2 diabetes. OUTCOME MEASURES: Screening and randomization.

methodsInitial eligibility criteria included Mexican heritage, treatment with oral diabetes medication, residence in designated zip codes, planned residence in the area for two years, and enrollment in a specific insurance plan.

resultsRecruitment through the insurer resulted in only one randomized participant. Eligibility criteria were relaxed and subsequent efforts included bilingual advertisements, presentations at churches and community events, postings in clinics, partnerships with community providers, and CHW outreach. Zip codes were expanded multiple times and insurance criteria removed. CHW outreach resulted in 53% of randomized participants.

conclusionsDespite strong ties with the target community, culturally appropriate recruitment strategies involving community representation, and a large pool of potential participants, significant challenges were encountered in recruitment for this diabetes intervention trial. Researchers identified three key barriers to participation: study intensity and duration, lack of financial incentives, and challenges in establishing trust. For future research to be successful, investigators need to recognize these barriers, offer adequate incentives to compensate for intervention intensity, and establish strong trust through community partnerships and the incorporation of community members in the recruitment process.

Indexed as

Community-Based Participatory ResearchMexican AmericansPatient SelectionRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAdultChicagoCommunity Health WorkersDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2HumansSelf Care

Identifiers

PMID21462723
PMCPMC3704315
OpenAlexW102047855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.