Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21461941›Full record

ReviewProtoplasma2012

Chaperone receptors: guiding proteins to intracellular compartments.

Verena Kriechbaumer, Ottilie von Löffelholz, Ben M Abell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Protoplasma, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Identification of thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Salt stress proteins in plants: An overview.Frontiers in plant science · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Multiple PPR protein interactions are involved in the RNA editing system inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Bam machine: a molecular cooper.Biochimica et biophysica acta · 2012
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Verena KriechbaumerBiomedical Research Centre, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, UK.
Ottilie von Löffelholz
Ben M Abell
Sheffield Hallam University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E01559X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite mitochondria and chloroplasts having their own genome, 99% of mitochondrial proteins (Rehling et al., Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 5:519-530, 2004) and more than 95% of chloroplast proteins (Soll, Curr Opin Plant Biol 5:529-535, 2002) are encoded by nuclear DNA, synthesised in the cytosol and imported post-translationally. Protein targeting to these organelles depends on cytosolic targeting factors, which bind to the precursor, and then interact with membrane receptors to deliver the precursor into a translocase. The molecular chaperones Hsp70 and Hsp90 have been widely implicated in protein targeting to mitochondria and chloroplasts, and receptors capable of recognising these chaperones have been identified at the surface of both these organelles (Schlegel et al., Mol Biol Evol 24:2763-2774, 2007). The role of these chaperone receptors is not fully understood, but they have been shown to increase the efficiency of protein targeting (Young et al., Cell 112:41-50, 2003; Qbadou et al., EMBO J 25:1836-1847, 2006). Whether these receptors contribute to the specificity of targeting is less clear. A class of chaperone receptors bearing tetratricopeptide repeat domains is able to specifically bind the highly conserved C terminus of Hsp70 and/or Hsp90. Interestingly, at least of one these chaperone receptors can be found on each organelle (Schlegel et al., Mol Biol Evol 24:2763-2774, 2007), which suggests a universal role in protein targeting for these chaperone receptors. This review will investigate the role that chaperone receptors play in targeting efficiency and specificity, as well as examining recent in silico approaches to find novel chaperone receptors.

Indexed as

Protein TransportAnimalsArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsChloroplastsEndoplasmic ReticulumHSC70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsHumansMembrane ProteinsMitochondriaMitochondrial MembranesMitochondrial Membrane Transport ProteinsPeroxisomesProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsArabidopsis ProteinsHSC70 Heat-Shock ProteinsHSP90 Heat-Shock ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMitochondrial Membrane Transport ProteinsReceptors, Cytoplasmic and NuclearToc64 protein, Arabidopsis

Identifiers

PMID21461941
OpenAlexW2062028581

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.