ArticleThe protein journal2011
Phylogenetic analysis of protein sequences based on distribution of length about common sub-string.
Article in The protein journal, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of an antimicrobial resistance plasmid transfer gene database for enteric bacteria.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Identifying anticancer peptides by using a generalized chaos game representation.Journal of mathematical biology · 2019Article
- A novel model for protein sequence similarity analysis based on spectral radius.Journal of theoretical biology · 2018Article
- Protein Sequence Comparison Based on Physicochemical Properties and the Position-Feature Energy Matrix.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- A new bioinformatics approach to natural protein collections: permutation structure contrasts of viral and cellular systems.The protein journal · 2013Article
- Information properties of naturally-occurring proteins: Fourier analysis and complexity phase plots.The protein journal · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Up to now, various approaches for phylogenetic analysis have been developed. Almost all of them put stress on analyzing nucleic acid sequences or protein primary sequences. In this paper, we propose a new sequence distance for efficient reconstruction of phylogenetic trees based on the distribution of length about common sub-sequences between two sequences. We describe some applications of this method, which not only show the validity of the method, but also suggest a number of novel phylogenetic insights.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.