Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21461315›Full record

ArticleCurrent immunology reviews2011

Aging of the Innate Immune System: An Update.

Shegufta Mahbub, Aleah L Brubaker, Elizabeth J Kovacs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current immunology reviews, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Sympathetic nerve-adipocyte interactions in response to acute stress.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Claims and reasons about mild COVID-19 in children.New microbes and new infections · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shegufta MahbubThe Burn and Shock Trauma Institute, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.
Aleah L Brubaker
Elizabeth J Kovacs

Funding

Aging, macrophage mediators, and burn trauma: SupplementR01AG018859 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI KOVACS, ELIZABETH J. · 2001 to 2024
$7.6M
Natural Killer T cells and the immune response to injuryR01AI056108 · NIAID · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI KOVACS, ELIZABETH J. · 2004 to 2008
$1.5M
Training in Immunology and AgingT32AG031780 · NIA · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI WITTE, PAMELA L. · 2009 to 2010
$148k
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI056108NIA NIH HHS R01 AG018859NIA NIH HHS T32 AG031780
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The relationship between advanced age and immunologic deficits is becoming an area of rapidly advancing research. Many of the clinical hurdles in the elderly population result from dysregulation of the immune system leading to the inability of the elderly to swiftly combat infection and to the increased incidence of chronic disease states and autoimmune conditions. Herein, we address the crucial alterations in the innate immune system that occur with advancing age. Specifically, we discuss how the effects of advanced age may lead to functional changes in the neutrophil, macrophage, dendritic cell, natural killer cell, and natural killer T cell populations in human and murine models that translate into aberrant innate immune responses. Furthermore, we elucidate how these changes may contribute to documented deficits in adaptive immunity as well as the pathological conditions and the increased morbidity and mortality seen in the elderly population.

Identifiers

PMID21461315
PMCPMC3066013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.