Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21461176›Full record

ArticleMaterials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications2009

Trabecular scaffolds created using micro CT guided fused deposition modeling.

B C Tellis, J A Szivek, C L Bliss, D S Margolis, R K Vaidyanathan, P Calvert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 124 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds.International journal of bioprinting · 2019
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Process-induced degradation of bioresorbable PDLGA in bone tissue scaffold production.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Designing Biomaterials for 3D Printing.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2016
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. A novel biomimetic polymer scaffold design enhances bone ingrowth.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A · 2009
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Sensate scaffolds can reliably detect joint loading.Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B C TellisOrthopedic Research Laboratory, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85724, United States.
J A Szivek
C L Bliss
D S Margolis
R K Vaidyanathan
P Calvert
University of Arizona · USAdvanced Ceramics Manufacturing (United States) · USUniversity of Massachusetts Dartmouth · US

Funding

Sensate Scaffolds for Orthopaedic Tissue RepairR01EB000660 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI SZIVEK, JOHN A · 2002 to 2005
$1.2M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB000660
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free form fabrication and high resolution imaging techniques enable the creation of biomimetic tissue engineering scaffolds. A 3D CAD model of canine trabecular bone was produced via micro CT and exported to a fused deposition modeler, to produce polybutylene terephthalate (PBT) trabeculated scaffolds and four other scaffold groups of varying pore structures. The five scaffold groups were divided into subgroups (n=6) and compression tested at two load rates (49 N/s and 294 N/s). Two groups were soaked in a 25 °C saline solution for 7 days before compression testing. Micro CT was used to compare porosity, connectivity density, and trabecular separation of each scaffold type to a canine trabecular bone sample. At 49 N/s the dry trabecular scaffolds had a compressive stiffness of 4.94±1.19 MPa, similar to the simple linear small pore scaffolds and significantly more stiff (p<0.05) than either of the complex interconnected pore scaffolds. At 294 N/s, the compressive stiffness values for all five groups roughly doubled. Soaking in saline had an insignificant effect on stiffness. The trabecular scaffolds matched bone samples in porosity; however, achieving physiologic connectivity density and trabecular separation will require further refining of scaffold processing.

Identifiers

PMID21461176
PMCPMC3065838
OpenAlexW1964142554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.