Quantification of Propionibacterium acidipropionici P169 bacteria in environmental samples by use of strain-specific primers derived by suppressive subtractive hybridization.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Strain-Specific Quantification of Native Probiotic Bacillus spp. and Their Effect on Liver Function and Gut Microflora of Experimental Rats.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2019
   Article
2. Development of a strain-specific real-time PCR assay for enumeration of a probiotic Lactobacillus reuteri in chicken feed and intestine.PloS one · 2014
   Article
3. Quantitative detection of viable Bifidobacterium bifidum BF-1 cells in human feces by using propidium monoazide and strain-specific primers.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2013
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

Indexed as