Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21460014›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2011

Efficacy of antiamebic drugs in a mouse model.

Stephen Becker, Paul Hoffman, Eric R Houpt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Tissue Destruction Caused byCurrent clinical microbiology reports · 2019
    Review
  7. Atorvastatin: In-Vivo Synergy with Metronidazole as Anti-The Korean journal of parasitology · 2018
    Article
  8. In Vitro Testing of PotentialThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen BeckerDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, 345 Crispell Drive, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. smb7yv@virginia.edu
Paul Hoffman
Eric R Houpt
University of Virginia · US

Funding

Nitrothiazolides:Broad-Spectrum Category B Anti-parasitic/bacterial TherapeuticsU01AI075520 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HOFFMAN, PAUL STOKES · 2007 to 2011
$2.6M
Mouse Strain dependent innate resistance to intestinal amebiasisR01AI071373 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HOUPT, ERIC R · 2006 to 2009
$1.5M
NIAID NIH HHS AI071373NIAID NIH HHS AI075520NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI071373NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI075520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nitroimidazole antibiotics are the mainstay of treatment of invasive amebiasis; however, few comparative studies of applicable antibiotics are available. Evidence of sporadic clinical failure and rare reports of metronidazole resistance have led to the investigation of novel antiamebic therapeutics. The goal of this study was to examine drug efficacy in both in vitro and in vivo models of intestinal amebiasis. We studied six current and three novel drugs. Many drugs, including metronidazole, nitazoxanide, and nitazoxanide derivatives, were shown to be potently inhibitory in vitro. However, metronidazole remained the most effective in vivo, both in preventative and curative regimens, underscoring the value of animal models in evaluating future therapies.

Indexed as

AmebiasisAnimalsAntiprotozoal AgentsMaleMiceMice, Inbred CBANitroimidazolesAntiprotozoal AgentsNitroimidazoles

Identifiers

PMID21460014
PMCPMC3062453
OpenAlexW2148258926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.