Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21459987›Full record

Trial reportPsychiatric services (Washington, D.C.)2011

Guided self-help treatment for recurrent binge eating: replication and extension.

Lynn L DeBar, Ruth H Striegel-Moore, G Terence Wilson, Nancy Perrin, Bobbi Jo Yarborough, John Dickerson, Frances Lynch, Francine Rosselli, Helena C Kraemer

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.), 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lynn L DeBarKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research, Portland, OR 97227, USA. lynn.debar@kpchr.org
Ruth H Striegel-Moore
G Terence Wilson
Nancy Perrin
Bobbi Jo Yarborough
John Dickerson
Frances Lynch
Francine Rosselli
Helena C Kraemer
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USWesleyan University · USPalo Alto University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

Guided Self-Help for Eating DisordersR01MH066966 · NIMH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI STRIEGEL, RUTH H · 2003 to 2007
$3.0M
NIMH NIH HHS MH066966NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH066966
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to replicate and extend results of a previous blended efficacy and effectiveness trial of a low-intensity, manual-based guided self-help form of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT-GSH) for the treatment of binge eating disorders in a large health maintenance organization (HMO) and to compare them with usual care.

methodsTo extend previous findings, the investigators modified earlier recruitment and assessment approaches and conducted a randomized clinical trial to better reflect procedures that may be reasonably carried out in real-world practices. The intervention was delivered by master's-level interventionists to 160 female members of a health maintenance organization who met diagnostic criteria for recurrent binge eating. Data collected at baseline, immediately posttreatment, and at six- and 12-month follow-ups were used in intent-to-treat analyses.

resultsAt the 12-month follow-up, CBT-GSH resulted in greater remission from binge eating (35%, N=26) than usual care (14%, N=10) (number needed to treat=5). The CBT-GSH group also demonstrated greater improvements in dietary restraint (d=.71) and eating, shape, and weight concerns (d=1.10, 1.24, and .98, respectively) but not weight change.

conclusionsReplication of the pattern of previous findings suggests that CBT-GSH is a robust treatment for patients with recurrent binge eating. The magnitude of changes was significantly smaller than in the original study, however, suggesting that patients recruited and assessed with less intensive procedures may respond differently from their counterparts enrolled in trials requiring more comprehensive procedures.

Indexed as

AdultBulimiaCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CareProgram DevelopmentSelf Care

Identifiers

PMID21459987
PMCPMC3962509
OpenAlexW2155848601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.