Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21459902›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2011

Patient-reported outcomes in a phase iii study of everolimus versus placebo in patients with metastatic carcinoma of the kidney that has progressed on vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

Jennifer L Beaumont, Zeeshan Butt, Jeanfrancois Baladi, Robert J Motzer, Tomas Haas, Norbert Hollaender, Andrea Kay, David Cella

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Quality of Life Outcomes for Cabozantinib Versus Everolimus in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: METEOR Phase III Randomized Trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Renal cell carcinoma.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2017
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. The Role of Everolimus in Renal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of kidney cancer and VHL · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jennifer L BeaumontDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 710 N Lake Shore Drive, Room 713, Chicago, Illinois 60611, USA. j-beaumont@northwestern.edu
Zeeshan Butt
Jeanfrancois Baladi
Robert J Motzer
Tomas Haas
Norbert Hollaender
Andrea Kay
David Cella
Northwestern University · USNovartis (Switzerland) · CHMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNovartis Foundation · CH

Funding

NCRR NIH HHS GRANT KL2-RR-0254740
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The focus of this paper is to evaluate the patient-reported outcomes.

methodsPatients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive oral everolimus 10 mg once daily or placebo. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Symptom Index-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) and European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 were administered before randomization and on day 1 of each cycle. The FKSI-DRS and the EORTC QLQ-C30 Physical Functioning and Global Quality of Life scores were the primary endpoints examined. Longitudinal models were used to compare treatment arms. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to explore the impact of missing data assumptions.

resultsLongitudinal trends for FKSI-DRS scores did not differ by treatment arm. Taking nonignorable missing data into account, there were significant differences between treatment arms in the trend over time for physical functioning and global quality of life, with the everolimus arm exhibiting greater decreases. All three of these measures of health-related quality of life were significantly related to progression-free survival.

conclusionsThere was no evidence of a difference between everolimus and placebo in longitudinal patterns of disease-related symptoms, and little difference between the arms in physical functioning or global quality of life trends. This supports the conclusion that delay in tumor progression demonstrated by everolimus is associated with minimal impact on symptoms, physical functioning, or quality of life, as reported by patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Renal CellDisease-Free SurvivalDouble-Blind MethodEverolimusFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPlacebosProtein-Tyrosine KinasesQuality of LifeEverolimusPlacebosProtein-Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Vascular Endothelial Growth FactorSirolimus

Identifiers

PMID21459902
PMCPMC3228193
OpenAlexW2102478789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.