ArticleNucleic acids research2011
ROS-DET: robust detector of switching mechanisms in gene expression.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Serum lipidome reveals lipid metabolic dysregulation in severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome.BMC medicine · 2024Article
- Subtype-specific network organization of molecular complexes in breast cancer.Journal of biosciences · 2023Article
- Identification and Validation of Key Genes of Differential Correlations in Gastric Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- Identification of Key Genes With Differential Correlations in Lung Adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Article
- New Statistical Methods for Constructing Robust Differential Correlation Networks to characterize the interactions among microRNAs.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- BFDCA: A Comprehensive Tool of Using Bayes Factor for Differential Co-Expression Analysis.Journal of molecular biology · 2017Article
- Differential correlation for sequencing data.BMC research notes · 2017Article
- Plasma microRNA biomarker detection for mild cognitive impairment using differential correlation analysis.Biomarker research · 2016Article
- DCGL v2.0: an R package for unveiling differential regulation from differential co-expression.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A switching mechanism in gene expression, where two genes are positively correlated in one condition and negatively correlated in the other condition, is a key to elucidating complex biological systems. There already exist methods for detecting switching mechanisms from microarrays. However, current approaches have problems under three real cases: outliers, expression values with a very small range and a small number of examples. ROS-DET overcomes these three problems, keeping the computational complexity of current approaches. We demonstrated that ROS-DET outperformed existing methods, under that all these three situations are considered. Furthermore, for each of the top 10 pairs ranked by ROS-DET, we attempted to identify a pathway, i.e. consecutive biological phenomena, being related with the corresponding two genes by checking the biological literature. In 8 out of the 10 pairs, we found two parallel pathways, one of the two genes being in each of the two pathways and two pathways coming to (or starting with) the same gene. This indicates that two parallel pathways would be cooperatively used under one experimental condition, corresponding to the positive correlation, and the two pathways might be alternatively used under the other condition, corresponding to the negative correlation. ROS-DET is available from http://www.bic.kyoto-u.ac.jp/pathway/kayano/ros-det.htm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.