Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21459801›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2011

Progesterone receptor isoform-specific promoter methylation: association of PRA promoter methylation with worse outcome in breast cancer patients.

Thushangi N Pathiraja, Priya B Shetty, Jaroslav Jelinek, Rong He, Ryan Hartmaier, Astrid L Margossian, Susan G Hilsenbeck, Jean-Pierre J Issa, Steffi Oesterreich

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Thushangi N PathirajaUniversity of Pittsburgh, 204 Craft Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Priya B Shetty
Jaroslav Jelinek
Rong He
Ryan Hartmaier
Astrid L Margossian
Susan G Hilsenbeck
Jean-Pierre J Issa
Steffi Oesterreich
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USBaylor College of Medicine · US

Funding

Tumor BiologyP30CA125123 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI DAVID R ROWLEY · 2007 to 2026
$73.9M
TUMOR SUPPRESSOR GENES IN BREAST CANCER DEVELOPMENTP50CA058183 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI OSBORNE, C KENT · 1992 to 2012
$30.9M
TRANSFORMING GROWTH FACTOR ALPHA IN PATHOGENESIS OF BREAST CANCERP01CA030195 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR SAN ANT · PI OESTERREICH, STEFFI · 1985 to 2009
$16.8M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA030195NCI NIH HHS P30 CA125123NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058183NCI NIH HHS P50CA58183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeERα and PR levels are critical determinants for breast cancer prognosis and response to endocrine therapy. Although PR is known to be silenced by methylation of its promoter, few studies have correlated methylation with PR levels and outcome in breast cancer. There is only one previous small study comparing methylation of the two PR isoforms, PRA and PRB, which are expressed from different promoters, and finally, there is no prior knowledge of associations between isoform-specific methylation and outcome. EXPERIMENTAL

designWe conducted a cohort-based study to test for associations between PRA and PRB methylation, expression, and clinical outcome in tamoxifen-treated patients (n = 500), and in patients who underwent surgery only (n = 500). Methylation and PR levels were measured by bisulfite pyrosequencing and ligand-binding assay, respectively.

resultsLow PR levels were significantly associated with worse outcome in all patients. PRA and PRB promoters were methylated in 9.6% and 14.1% of the breast tumors, respectively. The majority (74%) of PR-negative tumors were not methylated despite the significant inverse correlation of methylation and PR levels. PRA methylation was significantly associated with PRB methylation, although a subset of tumors had PRA only (3.9%) or PRB only (8.3%) methylated. Methylation of PRA, but not PRB was significantly associated with worse outcome in the tamoxifen-treated group.

conclusionsMechanisms other than promoter methylation may be more dominant for loss of PR. Isoform-specific methylation events suggest independent regulation of PRA and PRB. Finally, this article shows for the first time that PRA methylation plays a unique role in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAdultAgedAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene OrderHumansMiddle AgedPrognosisPromoter Regions, GeneticProtein IsoformsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneSurvival AnalysisAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalProtein IsoformsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID21459801
PMCPMC3955277
OpenAlexW2134047883

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.