Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21459097›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2011

Understanding apparent DNA flexibility enhancement by HU and HMGB architectural proteins.

Luke Czapla, Justin P Peters, Emily M Rueter, Wilma K Olson, L James Maher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. High-Resolution Characterization of DNA/Protein Complexes in Living Bacteria.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The HMGB1 C-Terminal Tail Regulates DNA Bending.Journal of molecular biology · 2016
    Article
  12. Article
  13. High-resolution mapping of architectural DNA binding protein facilitation of a DNA repression loop in Escherichia coli.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  14. DNA topology confers sequence specificity to nonspecific architectural proteins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Analyzing and building nucleic acid structures with 3DNA.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2013
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luke Czapla(1)Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, BioMaPS Institute for Quantitative Biology, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Justin P Peters
Emily M Rueter
Wilma K Olson
L James Maher
Mayo Clinic · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

THEORETICFAL ASPECTS OF DNA SUPERCOILINGR01GM034809 · NIGMS · RUTGERS THE ST UNIV OF NJ NEW BRUNSWICK · PI OLSON, WILMA K · 1985 to 2019
$4.6M
Enhancement of Cellular DNA FlexibilityR01GM075965 · NIGMS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI MAHER, LOUIS JAMES · 2006 to 2018
$4.2M
Computer Cluster for Computational and Structural BiologyS10RR022375 · NCRR · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI LEVY, RONALD · 2007 to 2007
$291k
NCRR NIH HHS RR022375NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR022375NIGMS NIH HHS GM075965NIGMS NIH HHS GM34809NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM034809NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding and predicting the mechanical properties of protein/DNA complexes are challenging problems in biophysics. Certain architectural proteins bind DNA without sequence specificity and strongly distort the double helix. These proteins rapidly bind and unbind, seemingly enhancing the flexibility of DNA as measured by cyclization kinetics. The ability of architectural proteins to overcome DNA stiffness has important biological consequences, but the detailed mechanism of apparent DNA flexibility enhancement by these proteins has not been clear. Here, we apply a novel Monte Carlo approach that incorporates the precise effects of protein on DNA structure to interpret new experimental data for the bacterial histone-like HU protein and two eukaryotic high-mobility group class B (HMGB) proteins binding to ∼200-bp DNA molecules. These data (experimental measurement of protein-induced increase in DNA cyclization) are compared with simulated cyclization propensities to deduce the global structure and binding characteristics of the closed protein/DNA assemblies. The simulations account for all observed (chain length and concentration dependent) effects of protein on DNA behavior, including how the experimental cyclization maxima, observed at DNA lengths that are not an integral helical repeat, reflect the deformation of DNA by the architectural proteins and how random DNA binding by different proteins enhances DNA cyclization to different levels. This combination of experiment and simulation provides a powerful new approach to resolve a long-standing problem in the biophysics of protein/DNA interactions.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputer SimulationDNADNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsHMGB1 ProteinHMGN ProteinsModels, MolecularMonte Carlo MethodNucleic Acid ConformationProtein ConformationRatsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsDNADNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsHbp1 protein, ratHMGB1 ProteinHMGN Proteinshns protein, E coliNHP6A protein, S cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21459097
PMCPMC3095720
OpenAlexW2068879237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.