Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21458462›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular biology2011

Two modes of binding of DinI to RecA filament provide a new insight into the regulation of SOS response by DinI protein.

Vitold E Galkin, Rachel L Britt, Lukas B Bane, Xiong Yu, Michael M Cox, Edward H Egelman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Mutate or die: Atomic structures explain bacterial SOS induction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  3. Structural basis for regulation of SOS response in bacteria.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. An Overview of the Molecular Mechanisms of Recombinational DNA Repair.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vitold E GalkinDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, University of Virginia, Jordan Hall 6007, 1340 Jefferson Park Avenue, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. galkin@virginia.edu
Rachel L Britt
Lukas B Bane
Xiong Yu
Michael M Cox
Edward H Egelman
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

THE BIOCHEMISTRY OF GENETIC RECOMBINATION/RECA PROTEINR01GM032335 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI COX, MICHAEL M. · 1985 to 2014
$6.8M
STRUCTURAL STUDIES OF RECA FILAMENTSR01GM035269 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI EGELMAN, EDWARD H. · 1986 to 2016
$5.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM032335NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM035269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RecA protein plays a principal role in bacterial SOS response to DNA damage. The induction of the SOS response is well understood and involves the cleavage of the LexA repressor catalyzed by the RecA nucleoprotein filament. In contrast, our understanding of the regulation and termination of the SOS response is much more limited. RecX and DinI are two major regulators of RecA's ability to promote LexA cleavage and strand exchange reaction, and are believed to modulate its activity in ongoing SOS events. DinI's function in the SOS response remains controversial, since its interaction with the RecA filament is concentration dependent and may result in either stabilization or depolymerization of the filament. The 17 C-terminal residues of RecA modulate the interaction between DinI and RecA. We demonstrate that DinI binds to the active RecA filament in two distinct structural modes. In the first mode, DinI binds to the C-terminus of a RecA protomer. In the second mode, DinI resides deeply in the groove of the RecA filament, with its negatively charged C-terminal helix proximal to the L2 loop of RecA. The deletion of the 17 C-terminal residues of RecA favors the second mode of binding. We suggest that the negatively charged C-terminus of RecA prevents DinI from entering the groove and protects the RecA filament from depolymerization. Polymorphic binding of DinI to RecA filaments implies an even more complex role of DinI in the bacterial SOS response.

Indexed as

SOS Response, GeneticsEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsProtein BindingProtein ConformationRec A RecombinasesDinI protein, E coliEscherichia coli ProteinsRec A Recombinases

Identifiers

PMID21458462
PMCPMC3089025
OpenAlexW2080126000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.