Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21458263›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2011

Quantitative variation in autocrine signaling and pathway crosstalk in the Caenorhabditis vulval network.

Erika Hoyos, Kerry Kim, Josselin Milloz, Michalis Barkoulas, Jean-Baptiste Pénigault, Edwin Munro, Marie-Anne Félix

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A gap-free, telomere-to-telomere genome assembly for thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Understanding developmental system drift.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Physiological Starvation PromotesG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
  14. Outstanding questions in developmental ERK signaling.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Pervasive robustness in biological systems.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Erika HoyosCenter for Cell Dynamics, University of Washington, 620 University Road, Friday Harbor, WA 98250, USA.
Kerry Kim
Josselin Milloz
Michalis Barkoulas
Jean-Baptiste Pénigault
Edwin Munro
Marie-Anne Félix
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

GENE NETWORKS: FROM MOLECULES TO MECHANISTIC MODELSP50GM066050 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ODELL, GARRETT M · 2002 to 2010
$12.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS 5 P50 GM66050NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM066050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBiological networks experience quantitative change in response to environmental and evolutionary variation. Computational modeling allows exploration of network parameter space corresponding to such variations. The intercellular signaling network underlying Caenorhabditis vulval development specifies three fates in a row of six precursor cells, yielding a quasi-invariant 3°3°2°1°2°3° cell fate pattern. Two seemingly conflicting verbal models of vulval precursor cell fate specification have been proposed: sequential induction by the EGF-MAP kinase and Notch pathways, or morphogen-based induction by the former.

resultsTo study the mechanistic and evolutionary system properties of this network, we combine experimental studies with computational modeling, using a model that keeps the network architecture constant but varies parameters. We first show that the Delta autocrine loop can play an essential role in 2° fate specification. With this autocrine loop, the same network topology can be quantitatively tuned to use in the six-cell-row morphogen-based or sequential patterning mechanisms, which may act singly, cooperatively, or redundantly. Moreover, different quantitative tunings of this same network can explain vulval patterning observed experimentally in C. elegans, C. briggsae, C. remanei, and C. brenneri. We experimentally validate model predictions, such as interspecific differences in isolated vulval precursor cell behavior and in spatial regulation of Notch activity.

conclusionsOur study illustrates how quantitative variation in the same network comprises developmental patterning modes that were previously considered qualitatively distinct and also accounts for evolution among closely related species.

Indexed as

Autocrine CommunicationBody PatterningSignal TransductionAnimalsBiological EvolutionCaenorhabditisCaenorhabditis elegansComputer SimulationEmbryonic InductionEpidermal Growth FactorFemaleIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesModels, BiologicalReceptor, Notch1VulvaEpidermal Growth FactorIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMitogen-Activated Protein KinasesReceptor, Notch1

Identifiers

PMID21458263
PMCPMC3084603
OpenAlexW2064691827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.