ArticleFertility and sterility2011
Proficiency in oocyte retrieval: how many procedures are necessary for training?
Article in Fertility and sterility, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intra-abdominal hemorrhage following ultrasound-guided transvaginal oocyte retrieval: Retrospective analysis of 25 cases.AJOG global reports · 2025Article
- Outcomes of oocyte retrievals completed by reproductive endocrinology and infertility fellows versus faculty: a 7-year retrospective review.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
- Assessment of operator performance during oocyte retrievals: residents' learning curve and continuous monitoring of senior physicians.BMC medical education · 2021Article
- A Pilot Study on Oocyte Retrieval Simulator: A New Tool for Training?Journal of medical systems · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine a minimum number of procedures required for proficiency in oocyte retrieval and to characterize skill acquisition.
designRetrospective analysis.
settingReproductive endocrinology and infertility fellowship training program. SUBJECT(S): Fellows in training from 2005 to 2007 and 2008 to 2010. INTERVENTION(S): None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Proficiency scores were calculated by dividing the number of oocytes retrieved by oocytes expected. The 2005 to 2007 trainees were grouped and proficiency scores calculated as an average during specific points in their training. The 2008 to 2010 trainees were compared individually to determine differences in individual skill acquisition. RESULT(S): A greater number of oocytes were retrieved than expected, 8.6 versus 7.6. A relatively lower proficiency score was noted during the first 10 trainee aspirations (proficiency score=1.1) compared with subsequent aspirations (proficiency score=1.25 for retrievals 11-20, proficiency score=1.21 for retrievals 21-30 and >31). When individual fellows' scores were calculated, the majority achieved proficiency by 20 aspirations, and all but one trainee achieved the mean staff proficiency score by 50 retrievals. CONCLUSION(S): Regardless of a trainee's initial proficiency in oocyte retrieval, there were no statistically significant differences in the learning curve between trainees. The majority of individual fellows in training demonstrate proficiency in follicular aspirations within 20 procedures; however, a minority may require 50 procedures to achieve the proficiency of an attending physician.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.