Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21456705›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2011

Quantum mechanical theory of dynamic nuclear polarization in solid dielectrics.

Kan-Nian Hu, Galia T Debelouchina, Albert A Smith, Robert G Griffin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Characterization of strongly hyperfine-split protons by DNP.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Resonant Mixing Dynamic Nuclear Polarization.The journal of physical chemistry letters · 2023
    Article
  9. Frequency-swept dynamic nuclear polarization.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2023
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Dynamic nuclear polarization-enhanced, double-quantum filteredJournal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2022
    Article
  16. DNPSOUP: A simulation software package for dynamic nuclear polarization.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2022
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Site-specific dynamic nuclear polarization in a Gd(III)-labeled protein.Physical chemistry chemical physics : PCCP · 2020
    Article
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kan-Nian HuFrancis Bitter Magnet Laboratory, and Department of Chemistry, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA.
Galia T Debelouchina
Albert A Smith
Robert G Griffin

Funding

OverallP41EB002026 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GRIFFIN, ROBERT GUY · 2003 to 2018
$17.9M
High Field DNP in Biological SystemsR01EB002804 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI GRIFFIN, ROBERT GUY · 2003 to 2018
$9.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS EB-002026NIBIB NIH HHS EB-002804NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB002026NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB002804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microwave driven dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) is a process in which the large polarization present in an electron spin reservoir is transferred to nuclei, thereby enhancing NMR signal intensities. In solid dielectrics there are three mechanisms that mediate this transfer--the solid effect (SE), the cross effect (CE), and thermal mixing (TM). Historically these mechanisms have been discussed theoretically using thermodynamic parameters and average spin interactions. However, the SE and the CE can also be modeled quantum mechanically with a system consisting of a small number of spins and the results provide a foundation for the calculations involving TM. In the case of the SE, a single electron-nuclear spin pair is sufficient to explain the polarization mechanism, while the CE requires participation of two electrons and a nuclear spin, and can be used to understand the improved DNP enhancements observed using biradical polarizing agents. Calculations establish the relations among the electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) frequencies and the microwave irradiation frequency that must be satisfied for polarization transfer via the SE or the CE. In particular, if δ, Δ < ω(0I), where δ and Δ are the homogeneous linewidth and inhomogeneous breadth of the EPR spectrum, respectively, we verify that the SE occurs when ω(M) = ω(0S) ± ω(0I), where ω(M), ω(0S) and ω(0I) are, respectively, the microwave, and the EPR and NMR frequencies. Alternatively, when Δ > ω(0I) > δ, the CE dominates the polarization transfer. This two-electron process is optimized when ω(0S(1))-ω(0S(2)) = ω(0I) and ω(M)~ω(0S(1)) or ω(0S(2)), where ω(0S(1)) and ω(0S(2)) are the EPR Larmor frequencies of the two electrons. Using these matching conditions, we calculate the evolution of the density operator from electron Zeeman order to nuclear Zeeman order for both the SE and the CE. The results provide insights into the influence of the microwave irradiation field, the external magnetic field, and the electron-electron and electron-nuclear interactions on DNP enhancements.

Indexed as

Quantum TheoryElectric ConductivityElectronsElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyMagnetic Resonance SpectroscopyMicrowaves

Identifiers

PMID21456705
PMCPMC3078165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.