Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21456115›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2009

Evaluation of the AHRQ patient safety initiative: synthesis of findings.

Donna O Farley, Cheryl L Damberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Co-design of an intervention to improve patient participation in discharge medication communication.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Dissemination activities: a critical new role for substance abuse treatment organizations.The journal of behavioral health services & research · 2014
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Donna O FarleyRAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. farley@rand.org
Cheryl L Damberg

Funding

PHS HHS 290-02-0010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo present overall findings from the 4-year evaluation of the national patient safety initiative operated by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). DATA SOURCES: Interviews with AHRQ staff, grantees, and other patient safety stakeholders; published materials; and internal AHRQ documents. STUDY

designThe evaluation was structured to address a system framework of five components involved in improving safety. The initiative's contributions to improving each system component were assessed qualitatively, comparing results from three separate analyses—AHRQ's achievement of its patient safety goals, our own assessment of the initiative's activities, and independent stakeholder ratings of AHRQ's contributions. FINDINGS AND

conclusionsAHRQ has faced a daunting challenge for improving patient safety, given the complex problems of the U.S. health care system and the limited resources AHRQ has had to address them. The patient safety initiative achieved strongest progress for its contributions to knowledge of patient safety epidemiology and effective practices, where AHRQ has considerable experience, and to strengthening infrastructure to support adoption of safe practices. Progress was slower in establishing a national monitoring capability and dissemination of safe practices for adoption. AHRQ needs to expand efforts to apply new knowledge for stimulating use of safe practices in the field.

Indexed as

Evaluation Studies as TopicHealth Care SurveysHumansInformation DisseminationMedical ErrorsOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient Education as TopicQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareRetrospective StudiesSafety ManagementUnited StatesUnited States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Identifiers

PMID21456115
PMCPMC2677039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.