Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21456112›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2009

Training a patient safety work force: the patient safety improvement corps.

Stephanie S Teleki, Cheryl L Damberg, Melony E S Sorbero, Rebecca N Shaw, Lily A Bradley, Denise D Quigley, Allen M Fremont, Donna O Farley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stephanie S TelekiPolicy Researcher, RAND Health, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, USA. teleki@rand.org
Cheryl L Damberg
Melony E S Sorbero
Rebecca N Shaw
Lily A Bradley
Denise D Quigley
Allen M Fremont
Donna O Farley

Funding

PHS HHS 290-02-0010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEvaluate short-term effects of the Patient Safety Improvement Corps (PSIC), an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality–sponsored program to train state teams in patient safety skills/tools, to assess its contribution to building a national infrastructure supporting effective patient safety practices. DATA SOURCE: Self-reported information gathered from (1) group interviews at the end of each year; (2) individual telephone interviews 1 year later; (3) faxed information forms 2 years later. STUDY

designProgram evaluation of immediate and short-term process and impact (use of skills/tools, information sharing, changes in practice). DATA COLLECTION: Semistructured interviews; faxed forms. PRINCIPAL

findingsOne year after training, approximately half of Year 1 and 2 state agency representatives reported they had initiated or modified legislation to strengthen safe practices, and modified adverse event oversight procedures. Approximately three-quarters of hospital representatives said training contributed to modifications to adverse event oversight procedures and promotion of patient safety culture. Two years posttraining, approximately three-quarters of Year 1 trainees said they continued to use many skills/tools.

conclusionsThe PSIC contributed to building a national infrastructure supporting effective patient safety practices. Expanded training is needed to reach a larger fraction of the population for which this training is important.

Indexed as

Health Care SurveysHumansInformation DisseminationMedical ErrorsOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient Education as TopicProgram EvaluationQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality ImprovementRetrospective StudiesSafety ManagementSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited StatesUnited States Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

Identifiers

PMID21456112
PMCPMC2677036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.