Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21456051›Full record

ArticleBiopharmaceutics & drug disposition2011

Pharmacodynamic analysis of stress erythropoiesis: change in erythropoietin receptor pool size following double phlebotomies in sheep.

Mohammad I Saleh, John A Widness, Peter Veng-Pedersen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammad I SalehDivision of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.
John A Widness
Peter Veng-Pedersen
University of Iowa · US

Funding

THE RoLE OF NEONATAL ANEMIA IN LEARNING AND MEMORYP01HL046925 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI JOSEPHSON, CASSANDRA D · 1992 to 2022
$34.3M
IN VIVO RECEPTOR BINDING OF BIOPHARMACEUTICALSR21GM057367 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI VENG-PEDERSEN, PETER · 1998 to 1999
–
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL046925NHLBI NIH HHS P01 NIH HL46925NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM57367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A feedback receptor regulation model was incorporated into a pharmacodynamic model to describe the stimulation of hemoglobin (Hb) production by endogenous erythropoietin (EPO). The model considers the dynamic changes that take place in the EPO receptor (EPOR) pool under phlebotomy-induced anemia. Using a (125)I-rhEPO tracer the EPO clearance changes are evaluated longitudinally prior to and following phlebotomy-induced anemia indirectly to evaluate changes in the EPOR pool size, which has been shown to be linearly related to the clearance. The proposed model simultaneously captures the general behavior of temporal changes in Hb relative to EPO plasma clearance in five lambs (r = 0.95), while accounting for the confounding variables of phlebotomy and changes in the blood volume in the growing animals. The results indicate that under anemia the EPOR pool size is up-regulated by a factor of nearly two over baseline and that the lowest and highest EPOR pool sizes differ by a factor of approximately four. The kinetic model developed and the data-driven mechanism proposed serves as a starting point for developing an optimal EPO dosing algorithm for the treatment of neonatal anemia.

Indexed as

AnimalsBody WeightErythropoiesisErythropoietinHemoglobinsModels, BiologicalPhlebotomyReceptors, ErythropoietinRecombinant ProteinsSheepErythropoietinHemoglobinsReceptors, ErythropoietinRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21456051
PMCPMC3657587
OpenAlexW2024120396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.