Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21455901›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical discovery and collaboration2011

A cognitive task analysis of a visual analytic workflow: Exploring molecular interaction networks in systems biology.

Barbara Mirel, Felix Eichinger, Benjamin J Keller, Matthias Kretzler

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical discovery and collaboration, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Perspectives on systems biology applications in diabetic kidney disease.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2012
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara Mirel. bmirel@umich.edu.
Felix Eichinger
Benjamin J Keller
Matthias Kretzler
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USEastern Michigan University · US

Funding

Integrated Systems Biology Approach to Diabetic Microvascular ComplicationsR24DK082841 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ABCOUWER, STEVEN F, BROSIUS, FRANK C · 2008 to 2020
$13.1M
Molecular Progression Predictors in the Chronic Renal Insufficiency CohortR01DK079912 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KRETZLER, MATTHIAS · 2008 to 2012
$2.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK079912NIDDK NIH HHS R24 DK082841
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBioinformatics visualization tools are often not robust enough to support biomedical specialists’ complex exploratory analyses. Tools need to accommodate the workflows that scientists actually perform for specific translational research questions. To understand and model one of these workflows, we conducted a case-based, cognitive task analysis of a biomedical specialist’s exploratory workflow for the question: What functional interactions among gene products of high throughput expression data suggest previously unknown mechanisms of a disease?

resultsFrom our cognitive task analysis four complementary representations of the targeted workflow were developed. They include: usage scenarios, flow diagrams, a cognitive task taxonomy, and a mapping between cognitive tasks and user-centered visualization requirements. The representations capture the flows of cognitive tasks that led a biomedical specialist to inferences critical to hypothesizing. We created representations at levels of detail that could strategically guide visualization development, and we confirmed this by making a trial prototype based on user requirements for a small portion of the workflow.

conclusionsOur results imply that visualizations should make available to scientific users “bundles of features” consonant with the compositional cognitive tasks purposefully enacted at specific points in the workflow. We also highlight certain aspects of visualizations that: (a) need more built-in flexibility; (b) are critical for negotiating meaning; and (c) are necessary for essential metacognitive support.

Identifiers

PMID21455901
PMCPMC3090070
OpenAlexW2133795932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.