Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21455718›Full record

ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2011

Treatment of generalized dystonia.

Naomi Lubarr, Susan Bressman

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Generalized dystonia unraveled: Molecular mechanisms, diagnostic strategies, and treatment paradigms.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Dystonia and leveraging oral pharmacotherapy.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Naomi LubarrBeth Israel Medical Center, Phillips Ambulatory Care Center, 10 Union Square East Suite 5H, New York, NY, 10003, USA, nlubarr@chpnet.org.
Susan Bressman
Mount Sinai Beth Israel · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementThe armamentarium for clinicians treating patients with generalized dystonia, previously restricted to only a few oral medications that often caused intolerable side effects, has been radically expanded in the past decade with the widespread application of deep brain stimulation (DBS). With DBS, patients who in the past would have been restricted to a life of severe motor disability from a young age can now lead lives with only minimal symptoms. Although DBS should therefore be considered as a treatment option for any patient with severe, medically refractory dystonia, important questions remain about patient selection, including what factors predict which patients will benefit from DBS, and when in the course of disease DBS should be performed. Reports show that patients with primary dystonia respond better than those with secondary dystonia, and limb and axial muscles may improve more than cranial dystonia. Some studies also suggest that shorter duration of disease may be associated with better outcomes. However, it is important to note that even among those thought to respond best to DBS, i.e. patients with primary generalized dystonia, there is a subset that will have significant and sustained clinical benefit with oral medications. It is therefore important that adequate trials of oral medications be attempted prior to referral for surgery. On the other hand, once it is clear that medical therapies are not providing significant benefit or are not well tolerated, children with disabling generalized primary dystonia should be referred quickly for DBS. The dramatic clinical improvement that can be seen with DBS can restore normal or near-normal functioning and avoid the physical and emotional costs of an extended period of decreased physical and social functioning. In general, a levodopa trial should always be considered as the first treatment at the time of presentation of any patient with childhood-onset limb dystonia, in order to exclude dopa-responsive dystonia. Once a diagnosis of primary generalized dystonia is established, we typically initiate treatment with trihexyphenidyl, titrating slowly up to a high dose. We then frequently add baclofen as a second agent. If clinical improvement at that point is inadequate and the dystonia is causing significant functional impairment, we then consider referral for DBS.

Identifiers

PMID21455718
OpenAlexW2029110299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.