ArticlePloS one2011
Did modeling overestimate the transmission potential of pandemic (H1N1-2009)? Sample size estimation for post-epidemic seroepidemiological studies.
Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- CONSISE statement on the reporting of Seroepidemiologic Studies for influenza (ROSES-I statement): an extension of the STROBE statement.Influenza and other respiratory viruses · 2017Guideline
- Estimates of the reproduction number for seasonal, pandemic, and zoonotic influenza: a systematic review of the literature.BMC infectious diseases · 2014Pooled it
- Alternating quarantine for sustainable epidemic mitigation.Nature communications · 2021Article
- Sample size calculation for estimating key epidemiological parameters using serological data and mathematical modelling.BMC medical research methodology · 2019Article
- Role of short-term dispersal on the dynamics of Zika virus in an extreme idealized environment.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2017Article
- Synthesis of a high resolution social contact network for Delhi with application to pandemic planning.Artificial intelligence in medicine · 2015Article
- Dynamics of a new strain of the H1N1 influenza A virus incorporating the effects of repetitive contacts.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2014Article
- Age-dependent estimates of the epidemiological impact of pandemic influenza (H1N1-2009) in Japan.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2013Article
- Article
- Sample size considerations for one-to-one animal transmission studies of the influenza A viruses.PloS one · 2013Article
- Real-time numerical forecast of global epidemic spreading: case study of 2009 A/H1N1pdm.BMC medicine · 2012Article
- Estimation of outbreak severity and transmissibility: Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in households.BMC medicine · 2012Article
- Estimating the transmission potential of supercritical processes based on the final size distribution of minor outbreaks.Journal of theoretical biology · 2012Article
- Article
- The time required to estimate the case fatality ratio of influenza using only the tip of an iceberg: joint estimation of the virulence and the transmission potential.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2012Article
- Fever screening during the influenza (H1N1-2009) pandemic at Narita International Airport, Japan.BMC infectious diseases · 2011Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeroepidemiological studies before and after the epidemic wave of H1N1-2009 are useful for estimating population attack rates with a potential to validate early estimates of the reproduction number, R, in modeling studies. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsSince the final epidemic size, the proportion of individuals in a population who become infected during an epidemic, is not the result of a binomial sampling process because infection events are not independent of each other, we propose the use of an asymptotic distribution of the final size to compute approximate 95% confidence intervals of the observed final size. This allows the comparison of the observed final sizes against predictions based on the modeling study (R = 1.15, 1.40 and 1.90), which also yields simple formulae for determining sample sizes for future seroepidemiological studies. We examine a total of eleven published seroepidemiological studies of H1N1-2009 that took place after observing the peak incidence in a number of countries. Observed seropositive proportions in six studies appear to be smaller than that predicted from R = 1.40; four of the six studies sampled serum less than one month after the reported peak incidence. The comparison of the observed final sizes against R = 1.15 and 1.90 reveals that all eleven studies appear not to be significantly deviating from the prediction with R = 1.15, but final sizes in nine studies indicate overestimation if the value R = 1.90 is used.
conclusionsSample sizes of published seroepidemiological studies were too small to assess the validity of model predictions except when R = 1.90 was used. We recommend the use of the proposed approach in determining the sample size of post-epidemic seroepidemiological studies, calculating the 95% confidence interval of observed final size, and conducting relevant hypothesis testing instead of the use of methods that rely on a binomial proportion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.