Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21455299›Full record

ArticlePloS one2011

A protein domain co-occurrence network approach for predicting protein function and inferring species phylogeny.

Zheng Wang, Xue-Cheng Zhang, Mi Ha Le, Dong Xu, Gary Stacey, Jianlin Cheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Proteome-wide remodeling of protein location and function by stress.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zheng WangDepartment of Computer Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, United States of America.
Xue-Cheng Zhang
Mi Ha Le
Dong Xu
Gary Stacey
Jianlin Cheng

Funding

Integrated Prediction of Protein Struture at 1D, 2D and 3D LevelsR01GM093123 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI CHENG, JIANLIN · 2010 to 2023
$3.8M
New Scoring, Assembly and Evaulation Techiniques for Protein Structure PredictionR33GM078601 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI XU, DONG · 2008 to 2010
$659k
New Scoring, Assembly and Evaulation Techiniques for Protein Structure PredictionR21GM078601 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI XU, DONG · 2006 to 2007
$280k
NIGMS NIH HHS 1R01GM093123NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093123NIGMS NIH HHS R21 GM078601NIGMS NIH HHS R21/R33 GM078601NIGMS NIH HHS R33 GM078601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein Domain Co-occurrence Network (DCN) is a biological network that has not been fully-studied. We analyzed the properties of the DCNs of H. sapiens, S. cerevisiae, C. elegans, D. melanogaster, and 15 plant genomes. These DCNs have the hallmark features of scale-free networks. We investigated the possibility of using DCNs to predict protein and domain functions. Based on our experiment conducted on 66 randomly selected proteins, the best of top 3 predictions made by our DCN-based aggregated neighbor-counting method achieved a semantic similarity score of 0.81 to the actual Gene Ontology terms of the proteins. Moreover, the top 3 predictions using neighbor-counting, χ(2), and a SVM-based method achieved an accuracy of 66%, 59%, and 61%, respectively, when used to predict specific Gene Ontology terms of human target domains. These predictions on average had a semantic similarity score of 0.82, 0.80, and 0.79 to the actual Gene Ontology terms, respectively. We also used DCNs to predict whether a domain is an enzyme domain, and our SVM-based and neighbor-inference method correctly classified 79% and 77% of the target domains, respectively. When using DCNs to classify a target domain into one of the six enzyme classes, we found that, as long as there is one EC number available in the neighboring domains, our SVM-based and neighboring-counting method correctly classified 92.4% and 91.9% of the target domains, respectively. Furthermore, we benchmarked the performance of using DCNs to infer species phylogenies on six different combinations of 398 single-chromosome prokaryotic genomes. The phylogenetic tree of 54 prokaryotic taxa generated by our DCNs-alignment-based method achieved a 93.45% similarity score compared to the Bergey's taxonomy. In summary, our studies show that genome-wide DCNs contain rich information that can be effectively used to decipher protein function and reveal the evolutionary relationship among species.

Indexed as

PhylogenyAnimalsCaenorhabditis elegansComputational BiologyDrosophila melanogasterHumansPlantsProteinsProtein Structure, TertiarySaccharomyces cerevisiaeProteins

Identifiers

PMID21455299
PMCPMC3063783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.