Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21455121›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2011

Access to biologic treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries.

Ewa Orlewska, Ioan Ancuta, Branimir Anic, Catalin Codrenau, Nemanja Damjanov, Predrag Djukic, Ruxandra Ionescu, Lubomir Marinchev, Evgeny L Nasonov, Tonu Peets and 9 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Introduction of Biopharmaceuticals in Europe: A Cross-Sectional Study of Early Diffusion Patterns and Data Availability.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. The inequity of global healthcare in pediatric rheumatology.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2024
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 9 institutions in 7 countries.

Ewa OrlewskaCenter for Pharmacoeconomics, Warsaw, Poland. ewaorlewska@go2.pl
Ioan Ancuta
Branimir Anic
Catalin Codrenau
Nemanja Damjanov
Predrag Djukic
Ruxandra Ionescu
Lubomir Marinchev
Evgeny L Nasonov
Tonu Peets
Sonja Praprotnik
Rasho Rashkov
Jana Skoupa
Witold Tlustochowicz
Malgorzata Tlustochowicz
Matija Tomsic
Tiina Veldi
Jelena Vojinovic
Piotr Wiland
East Tallinn Central Hospital · EELjubljana University Medical Centre · SIUniversity Hospital St. Ivan Rilski · BGWojskowy Instytut Medycyny Lotniczej · PLCarol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROCenter for Social and Economic Research · PLKlinički centar Niš · RSUniversity Hospital Centre Zagreb · HRWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to assess and compare patients' access to biologic anti-RA drugs in selected Central and Eastern European (CEE) countries and to analyze the determinants of differences between countries. MATERIAL/

methodsThis is a multi-country survey study, based on a combination of desk research and direct contact with national RA stakeholders. Data was collected using a pre-defined questionnaire. Affordability was measured using an affordability index, calculated comparing the index of health care expenditures to the price index, using Poland as an index of 1.

resultsThe percentage of patients on biologic treatment in 2009 was highest in Hungary (5% RA patients on biologic treatment), followed by Slovenia (4.5%), Slovakia (3.5%), Czech Republic (2.92%), Romania (2.2%), Estonia (1.8%), and Croatia, Serbia, Poland (below 1.5%). Infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab and rituximab were included in the reimbursement system in all countries, but abatacept and tocilizumab were included only in Slovakia. In Slovenia, public payer covered 75% of the price, and 25% is covered by supplementary health insurance; in Bulgaria public payer covered 50% of etanercept and adalimumab costs, and 75% of rituximab cost. In other countries, biologic drugs are reimbursed at 100%. Affordability index for biologic drugs was the lowest in Slovenia (0.4). In each country national guidelines define which patients are eligible for biologic treatment. Disease Activity Score (DAS28) of over 5.1 and failure of 2 or more disease-modifying anti-RA drugs, including methotrexate, are commonly used criteria.

conclusionsThe most important factors limiting access to biologic anti-RA treatment in the CEE region are macroeconomic conditions and restrictive treatment guidelines.

Indexed as

Biological TherapyHealth Services AccessibilityAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidCosts and Cost AnalysisDelivery of Health CareEuropeHealth ExpendituresHealth Planning GuidelinesHumansAntirheumatic Agents

Identifiers

PMID21455121
PMCPMC3539513
OpenAlexW2154107728

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.