Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21454649›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2011

Structure-function analysis of the bacterial expansin EXLX1.

Nikolaos Georgelis, Akira Tabuchi, Nikolas Nikolaidis, Daniel J Cosgrove

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. O-Glycosylated expansinScience advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Catalysis does not explain expansin-mediated wall creep: Distinguishing catalytic ERPs from creep-active expansins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Reply to Cosgrove: Catalytic activity in expansin-like proteins does not explain wall creep but raises a flag.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A single-domain expansin-like protein fromProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Wild rice-associatedmSystems · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Structure and growth of plant cell walls.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Loosenin-Like Proteins fromApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nikolaos GeorgelisDepartment of Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802, USA.
Akira Tabuchi
Nikolas Nikolaidis
Daniel J Cosgrove

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We made use of EXLX1, an expansin from Bacillus subtilis, to investigate protein features essential for its plant cell wall binding and wall loosening activities. We found that the two expansin domains, D1 and D2, need to be linked for wall extension activity and that D2 mediates EXLX1 binding to whole cell walls and to cellulose via distinct residues on the D2 surface. Binding to cellulose is mediated by three aromatic residues arranged linearly on the putative binding surface that spans D1 and D2. Mutation of these three residues to alanine eliminated cellulose binding and concomitantly eliminated wall loosening activity measured either by cell wall extension or by weakening of filter paper but hardly affected binding to whole cell walls, which is mediated by basic residues located on other D2 surfaces. Mutation of these basic residues to glutamine reduced cell wall binding but not wall loosening activities. We propose domain D2 as the founding member of a new carbohydrate binding module family, CBM63, but its function in expansin activity apparently goes beyond simply anchoring D1 to the wall. Several polar residues on the putative binding surface of domain D1 are also important for activity, most notably Asp82, whose mutation to alanine or asparagine completely eliminated wall loosening activity. The functional insights based on this bacterial expansin may be extrapolated to the interactions of plant expansins with cell walls.

Indexed as

AlanineBacterial ProteinsBinding SitesCelluloseCell WallCloning, MolecularGluconacetobacterMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutationPlant ProteinsPolysaccharidesProtein BindingProtein ConformationProtein Structure, TertiaryStructure-Activity RelationshipAlanineBacterial ProteinsCelluloseexpansin protein, plantPlant ProteinsPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID21454649
PMCPMC3089525

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.