Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21454330›Full record

ReviewBiological research for nursing2011

Immunological methods for nursing research: from cells to systems.

Helena W Morrison, Charles A Downs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biological research for nursing, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Helena W MorrisonDepartment of Physiology, Georgia Health Science University, GA, USA. hmorrison@georgiahealth.edu
Charles A Downs

Funding

Cigarette Smoke Induced Injury in Alveolar Cells in Model SystemsF31NR010843 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI DOWNS, CHARLES A · 2008 to 2010
$111k
The Contribution of Inflammation to Brain Injury after StrokeF31NR010658 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI MORRISON, HELENA WILLINGTON · 2007 to 2010
$69k
NINR NIH HHS F31 NR010658NINR NIH HHS F31 NR010843NINR NIH HHS F31-NR010843-01NINR NIH HHS NIH F31-NR010658-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientists and clinicians frequently use immunological methods (IMs) to investigate complex biological phenomena. Commonly used IMs include immunocytochemistry (IC), enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and flow cytometry. Each of these methodologies exploits a common principle in IMs -the binding of an antibody to its antigen. Scientists continue to develop new methodologies, such as high-throughput immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in vivo imaging techniques, which exploit antibody-antigen binding, to more accurately answer complex research questions involving single cells up to whole organ systems. The purpose of this paper is to discuss established and evolving IMs and to illustrate the application of these methods to nursing research.

Indexed as

Clinical Nursing ResearchEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFlow CytometryHumansImmune SystemImmunohistochemistry

Identifiers

PMID21454330
PMCPMC3556641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.