Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21453449›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2011

Understanding the context of balanced scorecard implementation: a hospital-based case study in Pakistan.

Fauziah Rabbani, Sabrina Nh Lalji, Farhat Abbas, Sm Wasim Jafri, Junaid A Razzak, Naheed Nabi, Firdous Jahan, Agha Ajmal, Max Petzold, Mats Brommels and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. What impedes and what facilitates a quality improvement project for older hospitalized patients?International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Medical records department and balanced scorecard approach.Journal of education and health promotion · 2013
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fauziah RabbaniDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, PO Box 3500, Stadium Road, Karachi, Pakistan. fauziah.rabbani@aku.edu
Sabrina Nh Lalji
Farhat Abbas
Sm Wasim Jafri
Junaid A Razzak
Naheed Nabi
Firdous Jahan
Agha Ajmal
Max Petzold
Mats Brommels
Goran Tomson

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs a response to a changing operating environment, healthcare administrators are implementing modern management tools in their organizations. The balanced scorecard (BSC) is considered a viable tool in high-income countries to improve hospital performance. The BSC has not been applied to hospital settings in low-income countries nor has the context for implementation been examined. This study explored contextual perspectives in relation to BSC implementation in a Pakistani hospital.

methodsFour clinical units of this hospital were involved in the BSC implementation based on their willingness to participate. Implementation included sensitization of units towards the BSC, developing specialty specific BSCs and reporting of performance based on the BSC during administrative meetings. Pettigrew and Whipp's context (why), process (how) and content (what) framework of strategic change was used to guide data collection and analysis. Data collection methods included quantitative tools (a validated culture assessment questionnaire) and qualitative approaches including key informant interviews and participant observation.

resultsMethod triangulation provided common and contrasting results between the four units. A participatory culture, supportive leadership, financial and non-financial incentives, the presentation of clear direction by integrating support for the BSC in policies, resources, and routine activities emerged as desirable attributes for BSC implementation. The two units that lagged behind were more involved in direct inpatient care and carried a considerable clinical workload. Role clarification and consensus about the purpose and benefits of the BSC were noted as key strategies for overcoming implementation challenges in two clinical units that were relatively ahead in BSC implementation. It was noted that, rather than seeking to replace existing information systems, initiatives such as the BSC could be readily adopted if they are built on existing infrastructures and data networks.

conclusionVariable levels of the BSC implementation were observed in this study. Those intending to apply the BSC in other hospital settings need to ensure a participatory culture, clear institutional mandate, appropriate leadership support, proper reward and recognition system, and sensitization to BSC benefits.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareCost-Benefit AnalysisData CollectionEfficiency, OrganizationalHospitals, UniversityHumansInformation ServicesInterviews as TopicModels, OrganizationalOrganizational Case StudiesOrganizational ObjectivesPakistanSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID21453449
PMCPMC3080822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.