Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21452810›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. B2011

Theoretical studies of the in-solution isomeric protonation of non-aromatic six-member rings with two nitrogens.

Peter I Nagy, William S Messer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. B, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter I NagyCenter for Drug Design and Development, The University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio 43606-3390, United States. pnagy@utnet.utoledo.edu
William S Messer

Funding

Muscarinic agonists for neurological disordersR01NS031173 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO · PI MESSER, WILLIAM S · 1994 to 2007
$1.4M
MOLECULAR STUDIES OF MUSCARINIC RECEPTOR SUBTYPESR01NS035127 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF TOLEDO · PI MESSER, WILLIAM S · 1997 to 1999
–
NINDS NIH HHS NS 31173NINDS NIH HHS NS 35127NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS031173NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS035127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For exploring the preferred site for hydrogen bond formation, theoretical calculations have been performed for a number of six-member, nonaromatic rings allowing for alternative protonation on the ring nitrogens. Gas-phase protonation studies for test molecules indicate that the B3LYP/aug-cc-pvtz and QCISD(T)(CBS) calculations approach the experimental values within about 1 kcal/mol with considerable improvement for relative enthalpies and free energies. Relative free energies calculated at the IEF-PCM/B3LYP/aug-cc-pvtz level predict favorable protonation on the tertiary rather than on the secondary nitrogen both in aqueous solution and in a dichloromethane solvent for saturated rings. Protonation on a nitrogen atom next to a C═C bond is disfavored due to a large increase in internal energy. Monte Carlo simulations considering a counterion and Ewald summation for the long-range electrostatic effects for a 0.1 molar model system predict ΔG(solv)/MC values generally less negative than from the IEF-PCM calculations. These results make the protonation on the tertiary nitrogen even more favored. The solute-solvent pair-energy distribution depends sensitively on the applied model. In conclusion, the freely moving anion has been considered as the most relevant model with overall neutrality for the system and applying the least restrictions.

Indexed as

Models, ChemicalProtonsGasesHydrogen BondingIsomerismMonte Carlo MethodNitrogenQuantum TheorySolutionsThermodynamicsGasesNitrogenProtonsSolutions

Identifiers

PMID21452810
PMCPMC3098565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.