ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2011
Modeling delayed drug effect using discrete-time nonlinear autoregressive models: a connection with indirect response models.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Indirect response (IDR) models have been widely applied to pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling, particularly when delayed response (hysteresis) is present. This paper proposes a class of nonlinear discrete-time autoregressive (AR) models with drug concentrations acting as a time-varying covariate on the asymptote parameter or the autocorrelation parameter of the AR models as an alternative modeling approach for delayed response data. The mathematical derivations revealed the inherent connection between IDR models and nonlinear AR models, and showed that the nonlinear AR models approximate the IDR models when the time interval between response data is small. Simulations demonstrate that the IDR models and the corresponding AR models produce similar temporal response profiles, and as the time interval decreased (i.e., more intensive sampling designs), the AR model based parameter estimates were more comparable to those estimated from the IDR models. In conjunction with mixed-effects modeling, the nonlinear AR models have been shown to well describe a set of simulated longitudinal PK/PD data for a clinical study. Further extensions of the proposed nonlinear AR models are warranted to model irregular and sparse PK/PD data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21451962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.