Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21451757›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2011

Evaluation of a required senior research project in a doctor of pharmacy curriculum.

Doris J Kao, Karen Suchanek Hudmon, Robin L Corelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Practical Insights for the Pharmacist Educator on Student Engagement.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2016
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Pathways to Improve Student Pharmacists' Experience in Research.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2015
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Student scientific inquiry in the core curriculum.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A curriculum development simulation in a graduate program.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2011
    Article
  19. An elective course to engage pharmacy students in research activities.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2011
    Article
  20. Is there a need for more research-based courses in the PharmD curriculum?American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Doris J KaoDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of California-San Francisco, 521 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143-0622, USA.
Karen Suchanek Hudmon
Robin L Corelli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo characterize the dissemination of study findings and assess project preceptor attitudes towards a required senior research project in a doctor of pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum.

methodsA survey was conducted to determine preceptors' perceptions of the value of a required pharmacy student research project and dissemination of research results.

resultsOne hundred fifteen project preceptors (92.0%) responded. Most preceptors agreed that the projects provided a valuable learning experience to the students (87.5%) and were of value to them professionally (82.1%) and to their institution (78.2%). Study findings were disseminated primarily through institutional forums (47.3%). A smaller percentage of projects were disseminated externally through presentations at professional meetings (23.7%, poster presentations; 4.0%, platform presentations), and peer-reviewed publications (5.3%).

conclusionsDespite a modest level of dissemination of project results through presentations at professional meetings and a low level of dissemination via published manuscripts, the majority of preceptors perceived a required student research project to be of value.

Indexed as

ResearchStudents, PharmacyCurriculumData CollectionEducation, PharmacyHumansInformation DisseminationPreceptorshipcurriculum requirementsdoctor of pharmacy degreeresearchstudent research

Identifiers

PMID21451757
PMCPMC3049664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.