Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21451512›Full record

ReviewNature methods2011

Validating transcripts with probes and imaging technology.

Shalev Itzkovitz, Alexander van Oudenaarden

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature methods, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Cellular Computational Logic Using Toehold Switches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shalev ItzkovitzDepartment of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Alexander van Oudenaarden

Funding

TRANS-NETWORK PROJECTSU54CA143874 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI MANALIS, SCOTT R · 2009 to 2013
$15.1M
Stochastic gene expression in differentiation and developmentDP1OD003936 · OD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI VAN OUDENAARDEN, ALEXANDER · 2008 to 2011
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143874NCI NIH HHS U54CA143874NIH HHS 1DP1OD003936NIH HHS DP1 OD003936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput gene expression screens provide a quantitative picture of the average expression signature of biological samples. However, the analysis of spatial gene expression patterns with single-cell resolution requires quantitative in situ measurement techniques. Here we describe recent technological advances in RNA fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) techniques that facilitate detection of individual fluorescently labeled mRNA molecules of practically any endogenous gene. These methods, which are based on advances in probe design, imaging technology and image processing, enable the absolute measurement of transcript abundance in individual cells with single-molecule resolution.

Indexed as

AnimalsData Interpretation, StatisticalDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicFluorescent DyesGene Expression ProfilingHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceRNA, MessengerRNA ProbesSingle-Cell AnalysisValidation Studies as TopicFluorescent DyesRNA, MessengerRNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID21451512
PMCPMC3158979

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.