ReviewNature methods2011
Clonal interrogation of stem cells.
Review in Nature methods, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Human gingival fibroblasts: Isolation, characterization, and evaluation of CD146 expression.Saudi journal of biological sciences · 2021Article
- Illumination of neural development byCell regeneration (London, England) · 2018Review
- Simple approach to three-color two-photon microscopy by a fiber-optic wavelength convertor.Biomedical optics express · 2016Article
- The Rise of CRISPR/Cas for Genome Editing in Stem Cells.Stem cells international · 2016Review
- Advancing stem cell therapy from bench to bedside: lessons from drug therapies.Journal of translational medicine · 2014Review
- In vitro pancreas organogenesis from dispersed mouse embryonic progenitors.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2014Article
- Heterogeneous structure of stem cells dynamics: statistical models and quantitative predictions.Scientific reports · 2014Article
- A glimpse into the interactions of cells in a microenvironment: the modulation of T cells by mesenchymal stem cells.International journal of nanomedicine · 2014Article
- Hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cells for the treatment of chronic respiratory diseases: role of plasticity and heterogeneity.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2014Review
- Artificial three-dimensional niches deconstruct pancreas development in vitro.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2013Article
- Number of glioma polyploid giant cancer cells (PGCCs) associated with vasculogenic mimicry formation and tumor grade in human glioma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2013Article
- Article
- NIR-activated content release from plasmon resonant liposomes for probing single-cell responses.ACS nano · 2012Article
- Three-color femtosecond source for simultaneous excitation of three fluorescent proteins in two-photon fluorescence microscopy.Biomedical optics express · 2012Article
- Microfluidic single-cell real-time PCR for comparative analysis of gene expression patterns.Nature protocols · 2012Article
- Progress in myeloma stem cells.American journal of blood research · 2011Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Individual stem cells are functionally defined by their self-renewal and differentiation potential. Methods for clonal analysis are essential for understanding stem cells, particularly given the increasing evidence for stem-cell heterogeneity. Stem cells reside within complex microenvironments, making single-cell analysis particularly challenging. Furthermore, simultaneous molecular and functional characterization of single stem cells is not trivial. Here we explore clonal assays applied to stem cell biology and their use in understanding the cellular and molecular basis of stem-cell identity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21451511What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.