Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21451165›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2011

Inferring physical protein contacts from large-scale purification data of protein complexes.

Sven-Eric Schelhorn, Julián Mestre, Mario Albrecht, Elena Zotenko

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Signaling hypergraphs.Trends in biotechnology · 2014
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Reverse engineering molecular hypergraphs.IEEE/ACM transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sven-Eric SchelhornMax Planck Institute for Informatics, Saarbrücken, Germany. sven@mpi-inf.mpg.de
Julián Mestre
Mario Albrecht
Elena Zotenko
Max Planck Institute for Informatics · DEMax Planck Society · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent large-scale data sets of protein complex purifications have provided unprecedented insights into the organization of cellular protein complexes. Several computational methods have been developed to detect co-complexed proteins in these data sets. Their common aim is the identification of biologically relevant protein complexes. However, much less is known about the network of direct physical protein contacts within the detected protein complexes. Therefore, our work investigates whether direct physical contacts can be computationally derived by combining raw data of large-scale protein complex purifications. We assess four established scoring schemes and introduce a new scoring approach that is specifically devised to infer direct physical protein contacts from protein complex purifications. The physical contacts identified by the five methods are comprehensively benchmarked against different reference sets that provide evidence for true physical contacts. Our results show that raw purification data can indeed be exploited to determine high-confidence physical protein contacts within protein complexes. In particular, our new method outperforms competing approaches at discovering physical contacts involving proteins that have been screened multiple times in purification experiments. It also excels in the analysis of recent protein purification screens of molecular chaperones and protein kinases. In contrast to previous findings, we observe that physical contacts inferred from purification experiments of protein complexes can be qualitatively comparable to binary protein interactions measured by experimental high-throughput assays such as yeast two-hybrid. This suggests that computationally derived physical contacts might complement binary protein interaction assays and guide large-scale interactome mapping projects by prioritizing putative physical contacts for further experimental screens.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsComputer SimulationData Interpretation, StatisticalModels, MolecularMultiprotein ComplexesPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesPhosphotransferasesProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein Interaction MappingSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsMultiprotein ComplexesPhosphoric Monoester HydrolasesPhosphotransferasesSaccharomyces cerevisiae Proteins

Identifiers

PMID21451165
PMCPMC3108834
OpenAlexW2146051292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.