Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21451064›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2011

Motor nucleus activity fails to predict extraocular muscle forces in ocular convergence.

Joel M Miller, Ryan C Davison, Paul D Gamlin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Neural Control of Vergence and Ocular Accommodation.Annual review of vision science · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Investigation of Selective Innervation of Extraocular Muscle Compartments.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Neural control of rapid binocular eye movements: Saccade-vergence burst neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  9. Is Primate Lens Accommodation Unilaterally or Bilaterally Controlled?Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Neural Plasticity Following Surgical Correction of Strabismus in Monkeys.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Abnormal activity of neurons in abducens nucleus of strabismic monkeys.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joel M MillerThe Smith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA. jmm@eidactics.com
Ryan C Davison
Paul D Gamlin
University of Alabama at Birmingham · USSmith-Kettlewell Eye Research Institute · US

Funding

Visual Phenotyping CoreP30EY003039 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI LAWRENCE C SINCICH · 1985 to 2026
$16.9M
Neural Control of a Complex Oculomotor PlantR01EY015314 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MILLER, JOEL M · 2004 to 2008
$2.4M
NEI NIH HHS EY-015314NEI NIH HHS P30-EY-03039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For a given eye position, firing rates of abducens neurons (ABNs) generally (Mays et al. 1984), and lateral rectus (LR) motoneurons (MNs) in particular (Gamlin et al. 1989a), are higher in converged gaze than when convergence is relaxed, whereas LR and medial rectus (MR) muscle forces are slightly lower (Miller et al. 2002). Here, we confirm this finding for ABNs, report a similarly paradoxical finding for neurons in the MR subdivision of the oculomotor nucleus (MRNs), and, for the first time, simultaneously confirm the opposing sides of these paradoxes by recording physiological LR and MR forces. Four trained rhesus monkeys with binocular eye coils and custom muscle force transducers on the horizontal recti of one eye fixated near and far targets, making conjugate saccades and symmetric and asymmetric vergence movements of 16-27°. Consistent with earlier findings, we found in 44 ABNs that the slope of the rate-position relationship for symmetric vergence (k(V)) was lower than that for conjugate movement (k(C)) at distance, i.e., mean k(V)/k(C) = 0.50, which implies stronger LR innervation in convergence. We also found in 39 MRNs that mean k(V)/k(C) = 1.53, implying stronger MR innervation in convergence as well. Despite there being stronger innervation in convergence at a given eye position, we found both LR and MR muscle forces to be slightly lower in convergence, -0.40 and -0.20 g, respectively. We conclude that the relationship of ensemble MN activity to total oculorotary muscle force is different in converged gaze than when convergence is relaxed. We conjecture that LRMNs with k(V) < k(C) and MRMNs with k(V) > k(C) innervate muscle fibers that are weak, have mechanical coupling that attenuates their effective oculorotary force, or serve some nonoculorotary, regulatory function.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBrain StemConvergence, OcularElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFunctional LateralityMacaca mulattaMotor NeuronsMuscle StrengthOculomotor Muscles

Identifiers

PMID21451064
PMCPMC3118740
OpenAlexW2080785506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.