Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21451025›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2011

A neurally efficient implementation of sensory population decoding.

Kris S Chaisanguanthum, Stephen G Lisberger

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. How and why neural and motor variation are related.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2015
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Control of the gain of visual-motor transmission occurs in visual coordinates for smooth pursuit eye movements.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  8. The interaction of bayesian priors and sensory data and its neural circuit implementation in visually guided movement.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2012
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kris S ChaisanguanthumHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA. chaisang@phy.ucsf.edu
Stephen G Lisberger

Funding

NEURAL CONTROL OF EYE MOVEMENTR01EY003878 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LISBERGER, STEPHEN G · 1985 to 2013
$2.5M
Collaborative research: CRCNS: Precision and coding in smooth pursuitR01EY017210 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LISBERGER, STEPHEN G · 2005 to 2010
$1.7M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNEI NIH HHS EY017210NEI NIH HHS R01 EY003878NEI NIH HHS R01 EY017210
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A sensory stimulus evokes activity in many neurons, creating a population response that must be "decoded" by the brain to estimate the parameters of that stimulus. Most decoding models have suggested complex neural circuits that compute optimal estimates of sensory parameters on the basis of responses in many sensory neurons. We propose a slightly suboptimal but practically simpler decoder. Decoding neurons integrate their inputs across 100 ms, incoming spikes are weighted by the preferred stimulus of the neuron of origin, and a local, cellular nonlinearity approximates divisive normalization without dividing explicitly. The suboptimal decoder includes two simplifying approximations. It uses estimates of firing rate across the population rather than computing the total population response, and it implements divisive normalization with local cellular mechanisms of single neurons rather than more complicated neural circuit mechanisms. When applied to the practical problem of estimating target speed from a realistic simulation of the population response in extrastriate visual area MT, the suboptimal decoder has almost the same accuracy and precision as traditional decoding models. It succeeds in predicting the precision and imprecision of motor behavior using a suboptimal decoding computation because it adds only a small amount of imprecision to the code for target speed in MT, which is itself imprecise.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsModels, NeurologicalNerve NetReaction TimeAnimalsCatsCell DivisionCognitionMacacaNeural ConductionNonlinear DynamicsRandom AllocationSensory Receptor Cells

Identifiers

PMID21451025
PMCPMC3085943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.