Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21450965›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2011

Evaluation of analytical and preliminary clinical performance of Myconostica MycAssay Aspergillus when testing serum specimens for diagnosis of invasive Aspergillosis.

P Lewis White, Michael D Perry, Adrian Moody, Sarah A Follett, Gillian Morgan, Rosemary A Barnes

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Aspergillus Polymerase Chain Reaction: Systematic Review of Evidence for Clinical Use in Comparison With Antigen Testing.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. (New) Methods for Detection ofCurrent fungal infection reports · 2019
    Article
  9. Molecular diagnostics in medical mycology.Nature communications · 2018
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Molecular Diagnostic Testing for Aspergillus.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. PCR Technology for Detection of Invasive Aspergillosis.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2016
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinical performance of a commercial real-time PCR assay for Aspergillus DNA detection in serum samples from high-risk patients: comparison with a galactomannan enzyme immunoassay.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P Lewis WhitePublic Health Wales, Microbiology Cardiff, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park, Cardiff CF14 4XN, United Kingdom. lewis.white@wales.nhs.uk
Michael D Perry
Adrian Moody
Sarah A Follett
Gillian Morgan
Rosemary A Barnes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis remains a significant problem. PCR testing may aid diagnosis but is not yet included in disease-defining criteria due to a lack of standardization of assays and methodologies. This study investigated the analytical performance and the clinical sensitivity and specificity of the Myconostica MycAssay Aspergillus PCR (MAP) assay compared to those of a validated in-house Aspergillus PCR (IHP) test when testing serum specimens. Serum specimens spiked with Aspergillus genomic DNA had a limit of detection equivalent to 5 genomes and a linear dynamic range of 5 to >5 × 10(4) genomes for both assays. When testing clinical specimens (n = 170), the MAP assay had a sensitivity of 60 to 70% and a specificity of 90.5 to 100%. The IHP assay had a sensitivity of 50 to 80% and a specificity of 100%. A commercially available Aspergillus PCR assay provides a methodology that is standardized and reagents that are quality controlled. This facilitates multicenter evaluation of the clinical utility of PCR diagnosis. The performance of the MAP assay is comparable to that of the IHP assay and to those in previously reported studies evaluating commercial tests (galactomannan enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay).

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAspergillosisAspergillusClinical Laboratory TechniquesDNA, FungalHumansMiddle AgedMycologyPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificitySerumDNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID21450965
PMCPMC3122770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.