ArticleThe oncologist2011
Predictive value of in vitro mutation data to guide second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor selection: ready for prime time?
Article in The oncologist, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Significant advances in treatment and monitoring for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia have occurred over the last decade. With the introduction of the tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib, long-term outcomes have improved and new challenges, such as resistance, including mutations, have emerged. Research efforts into mutational analysis have intensified, with emphasis on the potential of using this technique to guide second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor selection. Although some data suggest that a small number of mutations may be associated with a less favorable response to treatment with one second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor versus another, these data need to be interpreted cautiously because they are derived primarily retrospectively from single-institution studies and a small number of patients. More research and clinical experience and a better understanding of the implications of in vitro data are needed before these data can be routinely incorporated into therapeutic decisions. Currently, there is no consensus on when to screen patients for mutations, what technique should be used, or how values should be reported. Selection of a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor should therefore be based upon its toxicity profile in conjunction with the patient's comorbidities and the practitioner's experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.