ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2011
Perfusion and aortic surgery: patient directed cardiopulmonary bypass and quality improvement.
Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Thromboendarterectomy and circulatory arrest.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aortic surgery frequently extends the boundaries of perfusion knowledge learned from non aortic cardiac surgery.This is due to the extremes of temperature, prolonged bypass times, hypothermic arrest, and selective organ(s) perfusion. Suboptimal perfusion can potentially affect outcomes even after technically successful aortic surgery. We present the concepts of patient directed bypass with regard to blood pressure, flow-during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), oxygen delivery, cooling, and carbon dioxide levels on bypass. Quality of perfusion during aortic surgery is then addressed in the context of Perfusion Standards of Reporting Trials (PERFSORT, www.perfsort.net). PERFSORT analyses these variables during bypass: blood pressure, hematocrit, lactate, glucose, and temperature, all of which are known to affect outcomes. PERFSORT can be applied to individual cases or a series, and although primarily designed for research publications, is equally useful in a purely clinical setting. A new concept from engineering called Lissajous figures is then discussed to potentially retrospectively assess the effects of ischemia during aortic surgery. This may help identify why some patients despite flawless surgery, anesthesia, and perfusion, in the absence of bleeding, stroke, and obvious causes of organ damage at the time of aortic surgery develop multi organ dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
21449244PMC4680101What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.