Evidence map›Paper›PMID 21449244›Full record

ArticleThe journal of extra-corporeal technology2011

Perfusion and aortic surgery: patient directed cardiopulmonary bypass and quality improvement.

Mike Poullis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of extra-corporeal technology, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Thromboendarterectomy and circulatory arrest.Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mike PoullisLiverpool Cardiothoracic Centre, Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Thomas Drive, Liverpool, England. mike.poullis@lhch.nhs.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic surgery frequently extends the boundaries of perfusion knowledge learned from non aortic cardiac surgery.This is due to the extremes of temperature, prolonged bypass times, hypothermic arrest, and selective organ(s) perfusion. Suboptimal perfusion can potentially affect outcomes even after technically successful aortic surgery. We present the concepts of patient directed bypass with regard to blood pressure, flow-during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), oxygen delivery, cooling, and carbon dioxide levels on bypass. Quality of perfusion during aortic surgery is then addressed in the context of Perfusion Standards of Reporting Trials (PERFSORT, www.perfsort.net). PERFSORT analyses these variables during bypass: blood pressure, hematocrit, lactate, glucose, and temperature, all of which are known to affect outcomes. PERFSORT can be applied to individual cases or a series, and although primarily designed for research publications, is equally useful in a purely clinical setting. A new concept from engineering called Lissajous figures is then discussed to potentially retrospectively assess the effects of ischemia during aortic surgery. This may help identify why some patients despite flawless surgery, anesthesia, and perfusion, in the absence of bleeding, stroke, and obvious causes of organ damage at the time of aortic surgery develop multi organ dysfunction.

Indexed as

AortaBlood PressureCardiopulmonary BypassHumansPostoperative ComplicationsPrecision MedicineQuality of Health CareRegional Blood FlowReperfusion

Identifiers

PMID21449244
PMCPMC4680101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.